Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
149
Grants
6
Denials
143
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
13.0%
70 / 540
Total decisions
540
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
13.0%
Grants: 70
Denial rate
87.0%
Denials: 470
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Michelle C. Araneta to begin hearing cases in May 2019. Judge Araneta earned a Bachelor of Science in 1975 from Arizona State University, a Master of Special Education in 1984 from the University of Arizona, and a Juris Doctor in 1989from California Western School of Law in San Diego. From 2000 to 2019, she served as aprosecutor with the Pima County Attorney’s Office in Tucson, Arizona. From 1995 to 1999, sheserved as a prosecutor with the District Attorney’s Office in Riverside, California. From 1991 to 1995, she was an associate attorney practicing tax and bankruptcy in Orange County, California.From 1989 to 1991, she worked as a law clerk for the Honorable David N. Naugle. Judge Araneta is a member of the Arizona State Bar and California Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Michelle Araneta.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 149 | 6 | 143 | 4.0% | 96.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 99 | 3 | 96 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 62 | 13 | 49 | 21.0% | 79.0% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 56 | 5 | 51 | 8.9% | 91.1% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 45 | 8 | 37 | 17.8% | 82.2% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 35 | 4 | 31 | 11.4% | 88.6% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 29 | 6 | 23 | 20.7% | 79.3% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 12 | 6 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Azerbaijan Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
149
Grants
6
Denials
143
Total decisions
99
Grants
3
Denials
96
Total decisions
62
Grants
13
Denials
49
Total decisions
56
Grants
5
Denials
51
Total decisions
45
Grants
8
Denials
37
Total decisions
35
Grants
4
Denials
31
Total decisions
29
Grants
6
Denials
23
Total decisions
12
Grants
6
Denials
6
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
11
Grants
3
Denials
8
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.