Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
209
Grants
27
Denials
182
Grant rate: 12.9%Denial rate: 87.1%
Immigration judge
John C Barnes
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
19.9%
163 / 817
Total decisions
817
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
19.9%
Grants: 163
Denial rate
80.0%
Denials: 654
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed John Cody Barnes as an immigration judge in June 2020. Judge Barnes earned a Bachelor of Science in 2002 from Texas A&M University and a Juris Doctor in 2009 from Ave Maria School of Law. From 2018 to 2020, he served as anassistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas, in Corpus Christi, Texas. From 2017 to 2018, he served as the editor of The Army Lawyer, Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, in Charlottesville, Virginia. From 2015 to 2017, he served asa training officer, Defense Counsel Assistance Program, U.S. Army, at Fort Belvoir, Virginia.From 2013 to 2015, he served as defense counsel, U.S. Army, in the following locations: Fort Sam Houston, Texas, and Fort Sill, Oklahoma. From 2010 to 2013, he served first as a laborcounsel for a year, and then as a trial counsel/special assistant U.S. attorney, U.S. Army, at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. Judge Barnes is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants163 / 817
Denials654 / 817
Other relief0 / 817
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to John C Barnes.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 209 | 27 | 182 | 12.9% | 87.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 168 | 35 | 133 | 20.8% | 79.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 70 | 5 | 65 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 50 | 8 | 42 | 16.0% | 84.0% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 40 | 5 | 35 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Ethiopia Sufficient sample | 35 | 22 | 13 | 62.9% | 37.1% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 33 | 7 | 26 | 21.2% | 78.8% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 26 | 1 | 25 | 3.8% | 96.2% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 14 | 2 | 12 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 11 | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 10 | 3 | 7 | 30.0% | 70.0% | View details | |
Azerbaijan Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details |
View details
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
168
Grants
35
Denials
133
Grant rate: 20.8%Denial rate: 79.2%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
70
Grants
5
Denials
65
Grant rate: 7.1%Denial rate: 92.9%
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
8
Denials
42
Grant rate: 16.0%Denial rate: 84.0%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
40
Grants
5
Denials
35
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
Ethiopia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
22
Denials
13
Grant rate: 62.9%Denial rate: 37.1%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
7
Denials
26
Grant rate: 21.2%Denial rate: 78.8%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
1
Denials
25
Grant rate: 3.8%Denial rate: 96.2%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
2
Denials
12
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
St. Barthélemy
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Afghanistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
8
Denials
3
Grant rate: 72.7%Denial rate: 27.3%
Turkiye
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
3
Denials
7
Grant rate: 30.0%Denial rate: 70.0%
Azerbaijan
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Grant rate: 37.5%Denial rate: 62.5%
Colombia
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Mauritania
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Grant rate: 28.6%Denial rate: 71.4%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Grant rate: 57.1%Denial rate: 42.9%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Quynh Vu Bain
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.1%
- Denial Rate
- 68.9%
Denise G. Brown
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
John Milo Bryant
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.2%
- Denial Rate
- 60.8%
Lawrence O Burman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 58.9%
- Denial Rate
- 41.1%
Raphael Choi
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 21.6%
- Denial Rate
- 78.4%
Joan V. Churchill
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 15.3%
- Denial Rate
- 84.7%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.