Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
108
Grants
11
Denials
97
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
13.5%
45 / 334
Total decisions
334
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
13.5%
Grants: 45
Denial rate
86.5%
Denials: 289
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Barr appointed Philip A. Barr to begin hearing cases in January 2020. Judge Barr earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1984 from University of Texas at Austin and a Juris Doctor in 2003 from Birmingham School of Law. From 2015 to 2019, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel (OCC), Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Atlanta. From 2010 to 2015, he served as an assistant chief counsel, OCC, OPLA, ICE, DHS, in Port Isabel and San Antonio, Texas. From 2004 to 2010, he was an immigration and criminal defense attorney in private practice in Birmingham, Alabama. Judge Barr is a member of the Alabama State Bar and State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Philip A Barr.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 108 | 11 | 97 | 10.2% | 89.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 81 | 16 | 65 | 19.8% | 80.2% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 73 | 3 | 70 | 4.1% | 95.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 40 | 0 | 40 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 10 | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details |
Total decisions
108
Grants
11
Denials
97
Total decisions
81
Grants
16
Denials
65
Total decisions
73
Grants
3
Denials
70
Total decisions
40
Grants
0
Denials
40
Total decisions
10
Grants
8
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.