Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
97
Grants
37
Denials
60
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
16.7%
121 / 724
Total decisions
724
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
16.7%
Grants: 121
Denial rate
83.3%
Denials: 603
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Jacob D. Bashore to begin hearing cases in May 2019. Judge Bashore earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1999 from Wright State University, a Juris Doctor in 2006 from the University of Tennessee College of Law, and a Master of Laws degreein 2011 from The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School. From 2006 to 2019, heserved as an attorney and circuit judge with the U.S. Army in the followinglocations: Grafenwoehr and Vilseck, Germany; Fort Belvoir, Virginia; Fort Campbell, Kentucky,and Fort Hood, Texas. Judge Bashore is a member of the Tennessee State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jacob D Bashore.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 97 | 37 | 60 | 38.1% | 61.9% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 70 | 0 | 70 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 63 | 2 | 61 | 3.2% | 96.8% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 60 | 9 | 51 | 15.0% | 85.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 54 | 0 | 54 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 49 | 1 | 48 | 2.0% | 98.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 42 | 17 | 25 | 40.5% | 59.5% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 19 | 4 | 15 | 21.1% | 78.9% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 18 | 1 | 17 | 5.6% | 94.4% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 16 | 10 | 6 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
97
Grants
37
Denials
60
Total decisions
70
Grants
0
Denials
70
Total decisions
63
Grants
2
Denials
61
Total decisions
60
Grants
9
Denials
51
Total decisions
54
Grants
0
Denials
54
Total decisions
49
Grants
1
Denials
48
Total decisions
42
Grants
0
Denials
42
Total decisions
42
Grants
17
Denials
25
Total decisions
25
Grants
0
Denials
25
Total decisions
19
Grants
4
Denials
15
Total decisions
18
Grants
1
Denials
17
Total decisions
16
Grants
10
Denials
6
Total decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Total decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Total decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Total decisions
10
Grants
6
Denials
4
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
8
Grants
5
Denials
3
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.