Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
366
Grants
8
Denials
358
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
14.5%
199 / 1372
Total decisions
1372
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
14.5%
Grants: 199
Denial rate
85.5%
Denials: 1173
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Brisack was appointed as an Immigration Judge in May 2005. He received an undergraduate degree in 1981 from the University of Nebraska, and a Juris Doctorate in 1985 from the University of Houston Law Center. From January to May 2005, Judge Brisack served as an attorney in the law firm of Rodriguez, Colvin, Chaney & Saenz, LL.P. in Mc Allen, Texas. He served as a partner and attorney in the law firm of Norquest & Brisack, LL.P. in Mc Allen from December 1991 to December 2004. Judge Brisack worked as an attorney in the Law Firm of Jarvis, Schwarz & Kittleman in Mc Allen from 1989 to December 1991. He also served as a law clerk and attorney at the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, in Mc Allen from 1988 to 1989. Judge Brisack is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Chris A Brisack.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 366 | 8 | 358 | 2.2% | 97.8% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 282 | 18 | 264 | 6.4% | 93.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 114 | 3 | 111 | 2.6% | 97.4% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 106 | 3 | 103 | 2.8% | 97.2% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 52 | 9 | 43 | 17.3% | 82.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 49 | 26 | 23 | 53.1% | 46.9% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 45 | 29 | 16 | 64.4% | 35.6% | View details | |
Somalia Sufficient sample | 44 | 3 | 41 | 6.8% | 93.2% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 34 | 1 | 33 | 2.9% | 97.1% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 33 | 7 | 26 | 21.2% | 78.8% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 31 | 11 | 20 | 35.5% | 64.5% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15.0% | 85.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 18 | 13 | 5 | 72.2% | 27.8% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% | 70.6% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 14 | 11 | 3 | 78.6% | 21.4% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 13 | 4 | 9 | 30.8% | 69.2% | View details | |
Kenya Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Bermuda Small sample | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details |
Total decisions
366
Grants
8
Denials
358
Total decisions
282
Grants
18
Denials
264
Total decisions
114
Grants
3
Denials
111
Total decisions
106
Grants
3
Denials
103
Total decisions
52
Grants
9
Denials
43
Total decisions
49
Grants
26
Denials
23
Total decisions
45
Grants
29
Denials
16
Total decisions
44
Grants
3
Denials
41
Total decisions
34
Grants
1
Denials
33
Total decisions
33
Grants
7
Denials
26
Total decisions
31
Grants
11
Denials
20
Total decisions
20
Grants
3
Denials
17
Total decisions
18
Grants
13
Denials
5
Total decisions
17
Grants
5
Denials
12
Total decisions
14
Grants
11
Denials
3
Total decisions
13
Grants
4
Denials
9
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Total decisions
7
Grants
6
Denials
1
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.