Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
123
Grants
20
Denials
103
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
23.8%
145 / 610
Total decisions
610
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
23.8%
Grants: 145
Denial rate
76.2%
Denials: 465
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Matthew C. Chan was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in December 2021. Judge Chan earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2008 from the University of Illinois at Chicago, and a Juris Doctor in 2011 from the John Marshall Law School in Chicago. From 2011 to 2021, he served as an Assistant Chief Counsel (ACC), Office of the Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Los Angeles. While an ACC, from 2019 to 2021, he served as a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, in Los Angeles. Judge Chan is a member of the State Bar of California and the Illinois State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Matthew Chan.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Niue Sufficient sample | 123 | 20 | 103 | 16.3% | 83.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 92 | 1 | 91 | 1.1% | 98.9% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 67 | 5 | 62 | 7.5% | 92.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 59 | 32 | 27 | 54.2% | 45.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 55 | 0 | 55 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 52 | 15 | 37 | 28.8% | 71.2% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 35 | 32 | 3 | 91.4% | 8.6% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 18 | 0 | 18 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Unknown Nationality Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
123
Grants
20
Denials
103
Total decisions
92
Grants
1
Denials
91
Total decisions
67
Grants
5
Denials
62
Total decisions
59
Grants
32
Denials
27
Total decisions
55
Grants
0
Denials
55
Total decisions
52
Grants
15
Denials
37
Total decisions
35
Grants
32
Denials
3
Total decisions
26
Grants
0
Denials
26
Total decisions
18
Grants
0
Denials
18
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Total decisions
7
Grants
6
Denials
1
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.