India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
195
Grants
165
Denials
30
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
85.7%
820 / 957
Total decisions
957
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
85.7%
Grants: 820
Denial rate
14.3%
Denials: 137
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Shuting Chen was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Chen earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2006 from the University of Oklahoma and a Juris Doctor in 2009 from Harvard Law School. From 2020 to 2022, she served as a staff attorney in the immigration unit of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco. From 2011 to 2020, she was an immigration attorney in private practice. From 2010 to 2011, she was an associate at Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, in Washington, D.C. Judge Chen is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Shuting Chen.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 195 | 165 | 30 | 84.6% | 15.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 167 | 154 | 13 | 92.2% | 7.8% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 103 | 89 | 14 | 86.4% | 13.6% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 84 | 60 | 24 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 81 | 69 | 12 | 85.2% | 14.8% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 76 | 66 | 10 | 86.8% | 13.2% | View details | |
Eritrea Sufficient sample | 37 | 37 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 36 | 33 | 3 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 30 | 29 | 1 | 96.7% | 3.3% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 29 | 24 | 5 | 82.8% | 17.2% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 26 | 14 | 12 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 22 | 21 | 1 | 95.5% | 4.5% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 16 | 10 | 6 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bermuda Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
195
Grants
165
Denials
30
Total decisions
167
Grants
154
Denials
13
Total decisions
103
Grants
89
Denials
14
Total decisions
84
Grants
60
Denials
24
Total decisions
81
Grants
69
Denials
12
Total decisions
76
Grants
66
Denials
10
Total decisions
37
Grants
37
Denials
0
Total decisions
36
Grants
33
Denials
3
Total decisions
30
Grants
29
Denials
1
Total decisions
29
Grants
24
Denials
5
Total decisions
26
Grants
14
Denials
12
Total decisions
22
Grants
21
Denials
1
Total decisions
16
Grants
10
Denials
6
Total decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.