Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
106
Grants
21
Denials
85
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
45.2%
305 / 675
Total decisions
675
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
45.2%
Grants: 305
Denial rate
54.8%
Denials: 370
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Judge Chugh to begin hearing cases in June 2015.Judge Chugh received a bachelor of arts degree and bachelor of science degree in 1999 from Michigan State University and a juris doctorate in 2002 from the American University Washington College of Law. From October 2004 to May 2015, Judge Chugh served as attorneyadvisor at the Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration Review, in Falls Church, Va. From 2002 to 2004, he worked as a judicial law clerk entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. Judge Chugh is a member of the New Jersey and New York State Bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Amit Chugh.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 106 | 21 | 85 | 19.8% | 80.2% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 104 | 71 | 33 | 68.3% | 31.7% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 82 | 19 | 63 | 23.2% | 76.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 70 | 15 | 55 | 21.4% | 78.6% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 45 | 37 | 8 | 82.2% | 17.8% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 34 | 20 | 14 | 58.8% | 41.2% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 29 | 7 | 22 | 24.1% | 75.9% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 22 | 2 | 20 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 14 | 13 | 1 | 92.9% | 7.1% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 14 | 12 | 2 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46.2% | 53.8% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 13 | 11 | 2 | 84.6% | 15.4% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 12 | 5 | 7 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 11 | 10 | 1 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 11 | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
Total decisions
106
Grants
21
Denials
85
Total decisions
104
Grants
71
Denials
33
Total decisions
82
Grants
19
Denials
63
Total decisions
70
Grants
15
Denials
55
Total decisions
45
Grants
37
Denials
8
Total decisions
34
Grants
20
Denials
14
Total decisions
29
Grants
7
Denials
22
Total decisions
22
Grants
2
Denials
20
Total decisions
14
Grants
13
Denials
1
Total decisions
14
Grants
12
Denials
2
Total decisions
13
Grants
6
Denials
7
Total decisions
13
Grants
11
Denials
2
Total decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Total decisions
12
Grants
5
Denials
7
Total decisions
11
Grants
10
Denials
1
Total decisions
11
Grants
8
Denials
3
Total decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.