Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
146
Grants
7
Denials
139
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
17.6%
149 / 849
Total decisions
849
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
17.6%
Grants: 149
Denial rate
82.5%
Denials: 700
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Judge Davis-Gumbs to begin hearing cases in January 2016. Judge Davis-Gumbs earned a Bachelor of Science degree in 1983 from John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York and a Juris Doctor in 1992 from Touro College, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center. From 2008 through 2015, Judge Davis-Gumbs served in the Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Dallas, in various capacities including deputy chief counsel, and previously as associate counsel, Central Law Division, and as associate counsel, Training and Knowledge Management Division. From 2002 through 2008, Judge Davis-Gumbs served as assistant chief counsel in the Office of Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DHS, in Newark, N.J. From 1997 through 2002, Judge Davis-Gumbs served as an asylum officer in the Office of International Affairs, in the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), in Rosedale, N.Y. From 1994 through 1997, Judge Davis-Gumbs served as special assistant/litigation coordinator for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, DOJ, in New York, N.Y. From 1993 through 1994, Judge Davis-Gumbs served as a law clerk, and from 1988 through 1993, as an inmate grievance counselor in the Trial Unit, New York City Department of Corrections. Judge Davis-Gumbs is a member of the New York Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Xiomara Diana Davis-Gumbs.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 146 | 7 | 139 | 4.8% | 95.2% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 130 | 2 | 128 | 1.5% | 98.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 115 | 26 | 89 | 22.6% | 77.4% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 112 | 0 | 112 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 61 | 1 | 60 | 1.6% | 98.4% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 35 | 6 | 29 | 17.1% | 82.9% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 30 | 11 | 19 | 36.7% | 63.3% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 27 | 1 | 26 | 3.7% | 96.3% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 14 | 13 | 1 | 92.9% | 7.1% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 11 | 7 | 4 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Romania Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Jordan Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details |
Total decisions
146
Grants
7
Denials
139
Total decisions
130
Grants
2
Denials
128
Total decisions
115
Grants
26
Denials
89
Total decisions
112
Grants
0
Denials
112
Total decisions
61
Grants
1
Denials
60
Total decisions
35
Grants
6
Denials
29
Total decisions
30
Grants
11
Denials
19
Total decisions
27
Grants
1
Denials
26
Total decisions
21
Grants
0
Denials
21
Total decisions
14
Grants
13
Denials
1
Total decisions
11
Grants
7
Denials
4
Total decisions
10
Grants
6
Denials
4
Total decisions
10
Grants
10
Denials
0
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.