Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
111
Grants
35
Denials
76
Grant rate: 31.5%Denial rate: 68.5%
Immigration judge
Michael P Davis
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
36.0%
140 / 389
Total decisions
389
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
36.0%
Grants: 140
Denial rate
64.0%
Denials: 249
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Michael P. Davis was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in August 2022. Judge Davis earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1997 from John Carroll University and a Juris Doctor in 2000 from the University of Illinois College of Law. From 2016 to 2022, he served as the Executive Deputy Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security. From 2012 to 2016, he served as ICE Deputy Principal Legal Advisor for Enforcement and Litigation. From 2005 to 2012, held the following roles at ICE: Appellate Counsel (2005-2007); Deputy Chief (2007-2009); and Chief of the ICE Immigration Law and Practice Division (2009-2012). From 2003 to 2005, he served as Associate Counsel, Refugee and Asylum Law Division, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security. From 2000 to 2003, he served as an assistant district counsel with the former Immigration and Naturalization Service in Los Angeles, entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. Judge Davis is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants140 / 389
Denials249 / 389
Other relief0 / 389
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Michael P Davis.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 111 | 35 | 76 | 31.5% | 68.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 81 | 22 | 59 | 27.2% | 72.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 48 | 18 | 30 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 32 | 9 | 23 | 28.1% | 71.9% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 21 | 8 | 13 | 38.1% | 61.9% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 13 | 9 | 4 | 69.2% | 30.8% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
India Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Azerbaijan Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Chad Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
81
Grants
22
Denials
59
Grant rate: 27.2%Denial rate: 72.8%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
48
Grants
18
Denials
30
Grant rate: 37.5%Denial rate: 62.5%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
9
Denials
23
Grant rate: 28.1%Denial rate: 71.9%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
8
Denials
13
Grant rate: 38.1%Denial rate: 61.9%
Brazil
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ghana
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
9
Denials
4
Grant rate: 69.2%Denial rate: 30.8%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Colombia
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Grant rate: 55.6%Denial rate: 44.4%
Venezuela
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Azerbaijan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Nepal
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Chad
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Egypt
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Iraq
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Stephen Alcorn
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
Erin Alexander
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 55.8%
- Denial Rate
- 44.2%
Lucy Baez
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 22.5%
- Denial Rate
- 77.5%
Illya-Karina J Bonet
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 22.3%
- Denial Rate
- 77.7%
Lisa De Cardona
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 47.6%
- Denial Rate
- 44.4%
Chase Calder Cleveland
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 11.2%
- Denial Rate
- 88.8%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.