Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
115
Grants
19
Denials
96
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
35.7%
119 / 333
Total decisions
333
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
35.7%
Grants: 119
Denial rate
64.3%
Denials: 214
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Roger H. Dinh was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2023. Judge Dinh earned a Bachelor of Science and a Bachelor of Arts in 2007, both from Santa Clara University, and a Juris Doctor in 2011 from Hofstra University School of Law. From 2016 to 2023, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Denver and San Francisco. From 2019 to 2021, while on temporary detail, he served as a special assistant U.S. attorney with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Ohio. From 2014 to 2015, he served as a special assistant U.S. attorney with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California. From 2012 to 2013, he was an associate attorney at Michael B. Schulman & Associates PC in New York. Judge Dinh is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Roger H Dinh.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colombia Sufficient sample | 115 | 19 | 96 | 16.5% | 83.5% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 71 | 27 | 44 | 38.0% | 62.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 32 | 24 | 8 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 32 | 14 | 18 | 43.8% | 56.3% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 19 | 4 | 15 | 21.1% | 78.9% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 15 | 3 | 12 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
115
Grants
19
Denials
96
Total decisions
71
Grants
27
Denials
44
Total decisions
32
Grants
24
Denials
8
Total decisions
32
Grants
14
Denials
18
Total decisions
19
Grants
4
Denials
15
Total decisions
15
Grants
3
Denials
12
Total decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.