Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
312
Grants
105
Denials
207
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
51.5%
296 / 575
Total decisions
575
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
51.5%
Grants: 296
Denial rate
48.5%
Denials: 279
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Mark D. Donovan was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2024. Judge Donovan earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1992 from The Catholic University of America, a Master of Business Administration in 2001 from Northeastern University, and a Juris Doctor in 2008 from New England Law - Boston. From 2012 to 2024, he was an associate at Considine & Furey LLP in Boston, practicing civil litigation and criminal defense. From 2008 to 2012, he was an assistant district attorney in the Bristol County District Attorney’s Office in Bristol County, Massachusetts. Judge Donovan is a member of the Massachusetts Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Mark D Donovan.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 312 | 105 | 207 | 33.7% | 66.3% | View details | |
Angola Sufficient sample | 62 | 56 | 6 | 90.3% | 9.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 43 | 34 | 9 | 79.1% | 20.9% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 34 | 21 | 13 | 61.8% | 38.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 34 | 20 | 14 | 58.8% | 41.2% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 12 | 6 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Sierra Leone Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
312
Grants
105
Denials
207
Total decisions
62
Grants
56
Denials
6
Total decisions
43
Grants
34
Denials
9
Total decisions
34
Grants
21
Denials
13
Total decisions
34
Grants
20
Denials
14
Total decisions
15
Grants
15
Denials
0
Total decisions
12
Grants
6
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.