Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
691
Grants
590
Denials
101
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
73.8%
1492 / 2021
Total decisions
2021
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
73.8%
Grants: 1492
Denial rate
26.2%
Denials: 529
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Judge Evalyn P. Douchy to begin hearing cases in March 2016. Judge Douchy earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1992 from Binghamton University and a Juris Doctor in 1995 from New York Law School. From 1997 to February 2016, she served as assistant chief counsel for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in New York. From 1996 through 1997, she was an associate at the Law Offices of Anil Jethmalani & Timothy Herrick, in New York. From 1995 through 1996, she was a lawyer at the Law Office of Mark S. Drucker in Jackson Heights, N.Y. Judge Douchy is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Evalyn P Douchy.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 691 | 590 | 101 | 85.4% | 14.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 329 | 248 | 81 | 75.4% | 24.6% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 182 | 158 | 24 | 86.8% | 13.2% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 144 | 53 | 91 | 36.8% | 63.2% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 106 | 96 | 10 | 90.6% | 9.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 83 | 36 | 47 | 43.4% | 56.6% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 62 | 18 | 44 | 29.0% | 71.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 54 | 22 | 32 | 40.7% | 59.3% | View details | |
Former Countries Moderate sample | 27 | 27 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 23 | 19 | 4 | 82.6% | 17.4% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 22 | 13 | 9 | 59.1% | 40.9% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 20 | 18 | 2 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 20 | 17 | 3 | 85.0% | 15.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 19 | 19 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Moderate sample | 15 | 13 | 2 | 86.7% | 13.3% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 15 | 11 | 4 | 73.3% | 26.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 15 | 7 | 8 | 46.7% | 53.3% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 11 | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 10 | 3 | 7 | 30.0% | 70.0% | View details |
Total decisions
691
Grants
590
Denials
101
Total decisions
329
Grants
248
Denials
81
Total decisions
182
Grants
158
Denials
24
Total decisions
144
Grants
53
Denials
91
Total decisions
106
Grants
96
Denials
10
Total decisions
83
Grants
36
Denials
47
Total decisions
62
Grants
18
Denials
44
Total decisions
54
Grants
22
Denials
32
Total decisions
27
Grants
27
Denials
0
Total decisions
23
Grants
19
Denials
4
Total decisions
22
Grants
13
Denials
9
Total decisions
20
Grants
18
Denials
2
Total decisions
20
Grants
17
Denials
3
Total decisions
19
Grants
19
Denials
0
Total decisions
15
Grants
13
Denials
2
Total decisions
15
Grants
11
Denials
4
Total decisions
15
Grants
7
Denials
8
Total decisions
11
Grants
8
Denials
3
Total decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Total decisions
10
Grants
3
Denials
7
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.