Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
155
Grants
1
Denials
154
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
11.8%
74 / 626
Total decisions
626
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
11.8%
Grants: 74
Denial rate
88.2%
Denials: 552
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Charissa S. Dvorak as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Dvorak earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1995 from Baylor University, a Masterof Arts in 1996 from Baylor University, a Juris Doctor in 1999 from Baylor University, and a Master of Business Administration in 2010 from Houston Baptist University. From 2016 to 2020, she was an attorney with Spencer Fane LLP, in Dallas. From 2012 to 2020, she was a leadinvestigator for GRACE, a national non-profit, in Lynchburg, Virginia. From 2000 to 2011, sheserved as an assistant criminal district attorney in Texas for the District Attorney Offices of Harris County, Mc Lennan County, and Dallas County. Judge Dvorak is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Charissa Dvorak.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 155 | 1 | 154 | 0.6% | 99.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 133 | 4 | 129 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 90 | 36 | 54 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 70 | 0 | 70 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 68 | 1 | 67 | 1.5% | 98.5% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 19 | 1 | 18 | 5.3% | 94.7% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 15 | 4 | 11 | 26.7% | 73.3% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
Total decisions
155
Grants
1
Denials
154
Total decisions
133
Grants
4
Denials
129
Total decisions
90
Grants
36
Denials
54
Total decisions
70
Grants
0
Denials
70
Total decisions
68
Grants
1
Denials
67
Total decisions
19
Grants
1
Denials
18
Total decisions
15
Grants
4
Denials
11
Total decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.