Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
120
Grants
36
Denials
84
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
65.4%
570 / 871
Total decisions
871
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
65.4%
Grants: 570
Denial rate
34.6%
Denials: 301
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed L. Batya Schwartz Ehrens to begin hearing cases in October 2019. Judge Schwartz Ehrens earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1999 from Emory University,a Juris Doctor in 2003 from American University Washington College of Law, and a Master of Business Administration in 2004 from American University Kogod School of Business. From 2012 to 2019, she was the founder and principal attorney at Schwartz Ehrens Immigration Law PLLC, in New York. From 2006 to 2012, she was an immigration attorney in private practice in New York. Judge Schwartz Ehrens is a member of the New Jersey State Bar and New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Lisa Ehrens.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 120 | 36 | 84 | 30.0% | 70.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 115 | 96 | 19 | 83.5% | 16.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 111 | 51 | 60 | 45.9% | 54.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 98 | 32 | 66 | 32.7% | 67.3% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 64 | 61 | 3 | 95.3% | 4.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 60 | 41 | 19 | 68.3% | 31.7% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Sufficient sample | 56 | 54 | 2 | 96.4% | 3.6% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 54 | 51 | 3 | 94.4% | 5.6% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 34 | 30 | 4 | 88.2% | 11.8% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 18 | 17 | 1 | 94.4% | 5.6% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 16 | 16 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 15 | 8 | 7 | 53.3% | 46.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 13 | 9 | 4 | 69.2% | 30.8% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details |
Total decisions
120
Grants
36
Denials
84
Total decisions
115
Grants
96
Denials
19
Total decisions
111
Grants
51
Denials
60
Total decisions
98
Grants
32
Denials
66
Total decisions
64
Grants
61
Denials
3
Total decisions
60
Grants
41
Denials
19
Total decisions
56
Grants
54
Denials
2
Total decisions
54
Grants
51
Denials
3
Total decisions
34
Grants
30
Denials
4
Total decisions
18
Grants
17
Denials
1
Total decisions
16
Grants
16
Denials
0
Total decisions
15
Grants
8
Denials
7
Total decisions
13
Grants
9
Denials
4
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
6
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.