India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
298
Grants
242
Denials
56
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
52.8%
602 / 1140
Total decisions
1140
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
52.8%
Grants: 602
Denial rate
47.2%
Denials: 538
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Laura C. Figueroa to begin hearing cases in October 2018. Judge Figueroa earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 from the University of Texas at San Antonio and a Juris Doctor in 2007 from the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law. From 2017 to 2018, she was an immigration attorney in private practice. From 2013 to 2016, she was an attorney and partner with Figueroa & Jiménez, PLLC. From 2010 to 2013, shewas an immigration attorney in private practice. From 2008 to 2010, she was an associateattorney with the Law Offices of Gerald M. Gonzales, P.C. All positions were in San Antonio,Texas. Judge Figueroa is a member of the Texas State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Laura C Figueroa.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 298 | 242 | 56 | 81.2% | 18.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 161 | 55 | 106 | 34.2% | 65.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 136 | 93 | 43 | 68.4% | 31.6% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 117 | 33 | 84 | 28.2% | 71.8% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 51 | 14 | 37 | 27.5% | 72.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 45 | 18 | 27 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 36 | 28 | 8 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 24 | 2 | 22 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 23 | 18 | 5 | 78.3% | 21.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 15 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 14 | 13 | 1 | 92.9% | 7.1% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% | 7.7% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
298
Grants
242
Denials
56
Total decisions
161
Grants
55
Denials
106
Total decisions
136
Grants
93
Denials
43
Total decisions
117
Grants
33
Denials
84
Total decisions
51
Grants
14
Denials
37
Total decisions
45
Grants
18
Denials
27
Total decisions
36
Grants
28
Denials
8
Total decisions
24
Grants
2
Denials
22
Total decisions
23
Grants
18
Denials
5
Total decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Total decisions
15
Grants
1
Denials
14
Total decisions
14
Grants
13
Denials
1
Total decisions
13
Grants
12
Denials
1
Total decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Total decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Total decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Total decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Total decisions
10
Grants
9
Denials
1
Total decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.