Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
43
Grants
31
Denials
12
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
45.4%
93 / 205
Total decisions
205
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
45.4%
Grants: 93
Denial rate
54.6%
Denials: 112
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Philip N. Fluhr was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Fluhr earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1995 from the State University of New York at Binghamton, and a Juris Doctor in 1998 from Loyola University New Orleans School of Law. From 2017 to 2023, and from 2011 to 2016, he served as an assistant U.S. attorney with the U.S. Attorney’s Office at the Northern District of Illinois in Chicago. From 2016 to 2017, he was a partner with Le Clair Ryan in Chicago and Newark, New Jersey. From 2006 to 2011, he served as senior associate general counsel in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in Washington D.C. From 2002 to 2006, he worked with Connell Foley LLP as an associate in Roseland, New Jersey. From 1998 to 2002, he served with the Judge Advocate General’s Corps of the U.S. Navy, first as a military prosecutor based at Fleet Activities Yokosuka in Japan and then as a legal officer on board the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk, which was homeported in Yokosuka, Japan. From 2003 to 2023, he served as a reserve officer assigned to the following locations: the Pentagon; Naval Station Newport in Rhode Island; Mac Dill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida; Naval Base San Diego in California; and the Washington Navy Yard. Since affiliating with the reserve component, Judge Fluhr has deployed to the Philippines, Iraq, Qatar, and Afghanistan. Judge Fluhr is a member of the Illinois State Bar, the New Jersey State Bar, and the Pennsylvania Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Philip Fluhr.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 43 | 31 | 12 | 72.1% | 27.9% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 24 | 9 | 15 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 19 | 4 | 15 | 21.1% | 78.9% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 18 | 4 | 14 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 15 | 5 | 10 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 13 | 4 | 9 | 30.8% | 69.2% | View details | |
Moldova Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Tonga Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
43
Grants
31
Denials
12
Total decisions
24
Grants
9
Denials
15
Total decisions
19
Grants
4
Denials
15
Total decisions
18
Grants
4
Denials
14
Total decisions
15
Grants
2
Denials
13
Total decisions
15
Grants
5
Denials
10
Total decisions
13
Grants
4
Denials
9
Total decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.