Immigration judge

Randall L Fluke

Community discussion · 0

Public EOIR asylum decision statistics

Status
active
Data source
EOIR Case Data

Grant rate

20.4%

145 / 711

Total decisions

711

Merits decision sample in current public statistics

Grant rate

20.4%

Grants: 145

Denial rate

79.6%

Denials: 566

Other relief rate

0.0%

Other relief: 0

Judge profile

This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.

Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Randall L. Fluke as an Immigration Judge in October 2020. Judge Fluke earned an Associate of Arts in 1981 from San Jacinto Junior College,a Bachelor of Arts in 1981 from the University of Texas at Austin, a Juris Doctor in 1984 from Texas Tech University School of Law, and a Master of Strategic Studies in 2013 from the U.S. Army War College. From 1990 to 2020, he served as an assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S.Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Texas. From 1986 to 1990, he served as an assistantdistrict attorney for Lubbock and Midland Counties, in Texas. From 1984 to 1985, he was anassociate attorney with Huffaker, Green, & Huffaker, Attorneys at Law, in Tahoka, Texas. From 1988 to 2018, he served in the U.S. Army Reserve, Judge Advocate General’s Corps, retiring asa colonel in 2018. His reserve and active duty assignments included: legal advisor, International Communications and Legislative Affairs Divisionand Operational Law, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Army (Pentagon) from 2016to 2018 (reserves); legal advisor to the Convening Authority and Chief of Staff for the Office of Military Commissions, Department of Defense from 2015 to 2016 (active duty mobilization);and, reserve military judge, Third Circuit, from 2012 to 2015. Previous assignments includedservice as assistant command judge advocate, 807th Medical Command (active dutymobilization) and leadership positions in numerous reserve units. Judge Fluke is a member of the State Bar of Texas.

This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.

Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report

Outcome distribution

Grants145 / 711
Denials566 / 711
Other relief0 / 711

Community perspective

Community discussion

Read public experiences and process discussions related to Randall L Fluke.

0 topics

You can start with these public topics

  • Share a public process or preparation experience
  • Discuss how to interpret public data
  • Ask a question without personal case details

Case details

0 rows

This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Case Ratio

-

Distribution

Showing 0 of 0

View by applicant nationality

Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.

Honduras

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

142

Grants

6

Denials

136

Grant rate: 4.2%Denial rate: 95.8%

Venezuela

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

137

Grants

75

Denials

62

Grant rate: 54.7%Denial rate: 45.3%

Mexico

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

84

Grants

1

Denials

83

Grant rate: 1.2%Denial rate: 98.8%

Guatemala

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

71

Grants

4

Denials

67

Grant rate: 5.6%Denial rate: 94.4%

Colombia

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

38

Grants

1

Denials

37

Grant rate: 2.6%Denial rate: 97.4%

Niue

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

33

Grants

13

Denials

20

Grant rate: 39.4%Denial rate: 60.6%

Spain

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

30

Grants

4

Denials

26

Grant rate: 13.3%Denial rate: 86.7%

Cuba

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

22

Grants

9

Denials

13

Grant rate: 40.9%Denial rate: 59.1%

Ecuador

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

13

Grants

0

Denials

13

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Turkiye

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

12

Grants

1

Denials

11

Grant rate: 8.3%Denial rate: 91.7%

India

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

10

Grants

0

Denials

10

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Russia

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

10

Grants

5

Denials

5

Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%

Peru

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

9

Grants

0

Denials

9

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Afghanistan

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

7

Grants

2

Denials

5

Grant rate: 28.6%Denial rate: 71.4%

Uzbekistan

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

7

Grants

0

Denials

7

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Egypt

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

2

Denials

4

Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%

Iran

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

2

Denials

4

Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%

Switzerland

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

0

Denials

6

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Ethiopia

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

5

Grants

1

Denials

4

Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%

Nicaragua

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

5

Grants

4

Denials

1

Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%

These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Other judges at the same immigration court

Michael P. Baird

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
18.3%
Denial Rate
81.7%
View details

David Beyleryan

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denial Rate
100.0%
View details

Attila Bogdan

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
1.3%
Denial Rate
98.7%
View details

Anthony Brown

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
3.7%
Denial Rate
96.3%
View details

Gary D. Burkholder

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
9.0%
Denial Rate
91.0%
View details

Monique Carreras-Amadeo

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
30.8%
Denial Rate
69.2%
View details
Disclaimer

This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.