Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
104
Grants
14
Denials
90
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
18.6%
179 / 960
Total decisions
960
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
18.6%
Grants: 179
Denial rate
81.3%
Denials: 781
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Judge D’Anna H. Freeman to begin hearing cases in March 2016. Judge Freeman earned a Bachelor of Science degree in 1988 from Baylor University, a Master of Public Health in 1995 from the University of Texas Health Science Center, and Juris Doctor in 2004 from the University of Houston Law Center. From 2007 to February 2016, Judge Freeman served in various capacities for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, including: as assistant chief counsel from 2013 to 2016, in Dallas; as senior attorney from 2010 through 2013, in Livingston, Texas; and as assistant chief counsel from 2007 through 2010, in Eloy, Ariz. From 2006 through 2007, she was a partner at Forrest & Harrison LLC, in Houston. From 2005 through 2006, she served as an attorney at Dunbar, Harden & Benson LLP, in Houston. From 2004 through 2005, she operated the Law Office of D’Anna Harrison, in Houston. Judge Freeman is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to D'Anna H Freeman.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Niue Sufficient sample | 104 | 14 | 90 | 13.5% | 86.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 93 | 1 | 92 | 1.1% | 98.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 90 | 2 | 88 | 2.2% | 97.8% | View details | |
Eritrea Sufficient sample | 77 | 39 | 38 | 50.6% | 49.4% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 74 | 6 | 68 | 8.1% | 91.9% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 63 | 18 | 45 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 57 | 15 | 42 | 26.3% | 73.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 56 | 1 | 55 | 1.8% | 98.2% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 40 | 17 | 23 | 42.5% | 57.5% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 33 | 1 | 32 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 27 | 3 | 24 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 22 | 6 | 16 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 19 | 11 | 8 | 57.9% | 42.1% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Moderate sample | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Somalia Moderate sample | 14 | 3 | 11 | 21.4% | 78.6% | View details | |
Syria Moderate sample | 11 | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details |
Total decisions
104
Grants
14
Denials
90
Total decisions
93
Grants
1
Denials
92
Total decisions
90
Grants
2
Denials
88
Total decisions
77
Grants
39
Denials
38
Total decisions
74
Grants
6
Denials
68
Total decisions
63
Grants
18
Denials
45
Total decisions
57
Grants
15
Denials
42
Total decisions
56
Grants
1
Denials
55
Total decisions
40
Grants
17
Denials
23
Total decisions
33
Grants
1
Denials
32
Total decisions
27
Grants
3
Denials
24
Total decisions
22
Grants
6
Denials
16
Total decisions
19
Grants
11
Denials
8
Total decisions
19
Grants
0
Denials
19
Total decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Total decisions
14
Grants
3
Denials
11
Total decisions
11
Grants
8
Denials
3
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.