Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
316
Grants
37
Denials
279
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
28.6%
254 / 888
Total decisions
888
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
28.6%
Grants: 254
Denial rate
71.4%
Denials: 634
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed John M. Furlong Jr. to begin hearing cases in May 2019. Judge Furlong earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1988 from Boston College and a Juris Doctorin 1994 from Suffolk University. From 2013 to 2019, he served as the deputy district director for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Boston,Massachusetts. From 2006 to 2013, he served as a deputy chief counsel for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), DHS, in the same office. From 1996 to 2006, he served as anassistant chief counsel for ICE, DHS, in Boston, Massachusetts. Judge Furlong is a member ofthe Massachusetts State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to John M. Jr Furlong.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 316 | 37 | 279 | 11.7% | 88.3% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 113 | 41 | 72 | 36.3% | 63.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 110 | 29 | 81 | 26.4% | 73.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 65 | 21 | 44 | 32.3% | 67.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 49 | 15 | 34 | 30.6% | 69.4% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 21 | 12 | 9 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 18 | 6 | 12 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Angola Moderate sample | 14 | 6 | 8 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 14 | 4 | 10 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 12 | 8 | 4 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 12 | 6 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details |
Total decisions
316
Grants
37
Denials
279
Total decisions
113
Grants
41
Denials
72
Total decisions
110
Grants
29
Denials
81
Total decisions
65
Grants
21
Denials
44
Total decisions
49
Grants
15
Denials
34
Total decisions
21
Grants
12
Denials
9
Total decisions
18
Grants
6
Denials
12
Total decisions
14
Grants
6
Denials
8
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
14
Grants
4
Denials
10
Total decisions
12
Grants
8
Denials
4
Total decisions
12
Grants
6
Denials
6
Total decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Total decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Total decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Total decisions
9
Grants
2
Denials
7
Total decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Total decisions
7
Grants
6
Denials
1
Total decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.