Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
51
Grants
2
Denials
49
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
7.3%
27 / 368
Total decisions
368
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
7.3%
Grants: 27
Denial rate
92.7%
Denials: 341
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Ralph E. Girvin Jr., as an Immigration Judge in October 2020. Judge Girvin earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1993 from the University of Texas at El Paso and a Juris Doctor in 1995 from St. Mary’s University School of Law. From 2018 to 2020,he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in El Paso,Texas. From 2016 to 2018, he served as an assistant U.S. attorney for the Western District of Texas. From 2000 to 2016, he served as an assistant attorney and chief of the Civil and Criminal Divisions, for the County of El Paso, Texas. From 1996 to 1999, he served as an assistant districtattorney for the 34th Judicial District of Texas. From 1986 to 1992, he served in variouscapacities in the U.S. Army Reserve and the Texas Army National Guard. Judge Girvin is amember of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Ralph E Girvin.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 51 | 2 | 49 | 3.9% | 96.1% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 37 | 3 | 34 | 8.1% | 91.9% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 34 | 1 | 33 | 2.9% | 97.1% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 26 | 11 | 15 | 42.3% | 57.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 21 | 2 | 19 | 9.5% | 90.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
51
Grants
2
Denials
49
Total decisions
37
Grants
3
Denials
34
Total decisions
34
Grants
1
Denials
33
Total decisions
26
Grants
0
Denials
26
Total decisions
26
Grants
11
Denials
15
Total decisions
25
Grants
0
Denials
25
Total decisions
25
Grants
0
Denials
25
Total decisions
21
Grants
2
Denials
19
Total decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.