Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
395
Grants
323
Denials
72
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
52.6%
1035 / 1967
Total decisions
1967
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
52.6%
Grants: 1035
Denial rate
47.4%
Denials: 932
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Dorothy A. Harbeck was appointed as an immigration judge in September 2006. She received a bachelor of arts degree in 1984 from Wellesley College and a juris doctorate in 1989 from Seton Hall University School of Law. She received a certificate in trial advocacy skills from the National Institute of Trial Advocacy at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. From 1990 to September 2006, Judge Harbeck was in private practice in Trenton and Red Bank, N.J. She is a former New Jersey Superior Court arbitrator and an accredited mediator. She is a member of the New Jersey and New York bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Dorothy A Harbeck.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 395 | 323 | 72 | 81.8% | 18.2% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 154 | 57 | 97 | 37.0% | 63.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 124 | 13 | 111 | 10.5% | 89.5% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 114 | 88 | 26 | 77.2% | 22.8% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 108 | 58 | 50 | 53.7% | 46.3% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 79 | 26 | 53 | 32.9% | 67.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 78 | 22 | 56 | 28.2% | 71.8% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 56 | 8 | 48 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 53 | 3 | 50 | 5.7% | 94.3% | View details | |
Guinea Sufficient sample | 46 | 22 | 24 | 47.8% | 52.2% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 46 | 34 | 12 | 73.9% | 26.1% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 45 | 32 | 13 | 71.1% | 28.9% | View details | |
Georgia Sufficient sample | 43 | 27 | 16 | 62.8% | 37.2% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 39 | 28 | 11 | 71.8% | 28.2% | View details | |
Pakistan Sufficient sample | 37 | 16 | 21 | 43.2% | 56.8% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Sufficient sample | 33 | 6 | 27 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Albania Sufficient sample | 31 | 22 | 9 | 71.0% | 29.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 30 | 7 | 23 | 23.3% | 76.7% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Moderate sample | 26 | 19 | 7 | 73.1% | 26.9% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 22 | 2 | 20 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details |
Total decisions
395
Grants
323
Denials
72
Total decisions
154
Grants
57
Denials
97
Total decisions
124
Grants
13
Denials
111
Total decisions
114
Grants
88
Denials
26
Total decisions
108
Grants
58
Denials
50
Total decisions
79
Grants
26
Denials
53
Total decisions
78
Grants
22
Denials
56
Total decisions
56
Grants
8
Denials
48
Total decisions
53
Grants
3
Denials
50
Total decisions
46
Grants
22
Denials
24
Total decisions
46
Grants
34
Denials
12
Total decisions
45
Grants
32
Denials
13
Total decisions
43
Grants
27
Denials
16
Total decisions
39
Grants
28
Denials
11
Total decisions
37
Grants
16
Denials
21
Total decisions
33
Grants
6
Denials
27
Total decisions
31
Grants
22
Denials
9
Total decisions
30
Grants
7
Denials
23
Total decisions
26
Grants
19
Denials
7
Total decisions
22
Grants
2
Denials
20
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.