Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
146
Grants
6
Denials
140
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
19.4%
115 / 594
Total decisions
594
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
19.4%
Grants: 115
Denial rate
80.6%
Denials: 479
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Natalie B. Huddleston to begin hearing cases in August 2018. Judge Huddleston earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 2001 and a Juris Doctor in 2004, both from the University of Notre Dame. From 2014 to 2018, she was assistant U.S.attorney in Phoenix. From 2013 to 2014, she was deputy county attorney with the Pinal County Attorney’s Office in Florence, Ariz. From 2008 to 2013, she was assistant attorney general withthe Office of the Arizona Attorney General in Phoenix. From 2004 to 2008, she was deputycounty attorney with the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, also in Phoenix. Judge Huddlestonis a member of the State Bar of Arizona.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Natalie Huddleston.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 146 | 6 | 140 | 4.1% | 95.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 124 | 4 | 120 | 3.2% | 96.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 102 | 8 | 94 | 7.8% | 92.2% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 34 | 2 | 32 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 33 | 30 | 3 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 17 | 9 | 8 | 52.9% | 47.1% | View details | |
Armenia Moderate sample | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Syria Moderate sample | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Madagascar Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
146
Grants
6
Denials
140
Total decisions
124
Grants
4
Denials
120
Total decisions
102
Grants
8
Denials
94
Total decisions
34
Grants
2
Denials
32
Total decisions
33
Grants
30
Denials
3
Total decisions
17
Grants
9
Denials
8
Total decisions
15
Grants
15
Denials
0
Total decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Total decisions
10
Grants
6
Denials
4
Total decisions
10
Grants
9
Denials
1
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.