Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
151
Grants
142
Denials
9
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
84.3%
404 / 479
Total decisions
479
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
84.3%
Grants: 404
Denial rate
15.7%
Denials: 75
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
David K. S. Kim was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Kim earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1990 from Emory University, a Master of Public Administration in 1997 from West Virginia University, and a Juris Doctor in 2001 from Brooklyn Law School. From 2011 to 2022, he was in private practice as the Founder and Principal Attorney of the Law Office of David K. S. Kim PC, in Flushing, NY, where his practice was exclusively devoted to immigration and nationality law. From 2006 to 2011, he was a senior associate at Bretz & Coven, LLP in New York City. From 2003 to 2006, he was an associate at Kurzban, Kurzban, Weinger, and Tetzeli P.A. in Miami. From 2001 to 2003, he served as a staff attorney law clerk for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Judge Kim is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to David Kim.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 151 | 142 | 9 | 94.0% | 6.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 89 | 65 | 24 | 73.0% | 27.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 35 | 32 | 3 | 91.4% | 8.6% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 35 | 35 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 30 | 27 | 3 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 14 | 5 | 9 | 35.7% | 64.3% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 12 | 7 | 5 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details |
Total decisions
151
Grants
142
Denials
9
Total decisions
89
Grants
65
Denials
24
Total decisions
35
Grants
32
Denials
3
Total decisions
35
Grants
35
Denials
0
Total decisions
30
Grants
27
Denials
3
Total decisions
14
Grants
5
Denials
9
Total decisions
12
Grants
7
Denials
5
Total decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.