Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
160
Grants
22
Denials
138
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
31.1%
335 / 1079
Total decisions
1079
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
31.1%
Grants: 335
Denial rate
69.0%
Denials: 744
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Michael Klosowsky as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Klosowsky earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2007 from Trinity University and a Juris Doctor in 2011 from the University of St. Thomas School of Law. From 2016 to 2020, heserved as assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor,Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in El Paso, Texas.From 2011 to 2016, he was an associate attorney with Klosowsky Law Office PLLC, in Sugar Land, Texas. Judge Klosowsky is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Michael Klosowsky.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 160 | 22 | 138 | 13.8% | 86.3% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 141 | 49 | 92 | 34.8% | 65.2% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 104 | 2 | 102 | 1.9% | 98.1% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 92 | 35 | 57 | 38.0% | 62.0% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 79 | 38 | 41 | 48.1% | 51.9% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 69 | 14 | 55 | 20.3% | 79.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 66 | 22 | 44 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 52 | 6 | 46 | 11.5% | 88.5% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 45 | 7 | 38 | 15.6% | 84.4% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Sufficient sample | 38 | 22 | 16 | 57.9% | 42.1% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 27 | 16 | 11 | 59.3% | 40.7% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 27 | 12 | 15 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 22 | 6 | 16 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Vietnam Moderate sample | 15 | 6 | 9 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Bermuda Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
160
Grants
22
Denials
138
Total decisions
141
Grants
49
Denials
92
Total decisions
104
Grants
2
Denials
102
Total decisions
92
Grants
35
Denials
57
Total decisions
79
Grants
38
Denials
41
Total decisions
69
Grants
14
Denials
55
Total decisions
66
Grants
22
Denials
44
Total decisions
52
Grants
6
Denials
46
Total decisions
45
Grants
7
Denials
38
Total decisions
38
Grants
22
Denials
16
Total decisions
27
Grants
16
Denials
11
Total decisions
27
Grants
12
Denials
15
Total decisions
22
Grants
6
Denials
16
Total decisions
15
Grants
6
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.