Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
317
Grants
278
Denials
39
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
77.1%
775 / 1005
Total decisions
1005
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
77.1%
Grants: 775
Denial rate
22.9%
Denials: 230
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Theodora N. Kouris to begin hearing cases in October 2019. Judge Kouris earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2005 from Cornell University and a Juris Doctor in 2009 from Boston College Law School. In 2019, she worked as an associate attorneyfor the Law Office of Usman B. Ahmad P.C., in Long Island, New York. From 2010 to 2019,she worked as an associate attorney at the Law Offices of Ted Sofer Esq. P.C., in New York.Judge Kouris is a member of the Massachusetts State Bar and New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Theodora N Kouris.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 317 | 278 | 39 | 87.7% | 12.3% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 184 | 142 | 42 | 77.2% | 22.8% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 88 | 77 | 11 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 48 | 22 | 26 | 45.8% | 54.2% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 47 | 46 | 1 | 97.9% | 2.1% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 28 | 28 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 26 | 6 | 20 | 23.1% | 76.9% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 25 | 24 | 1 | 96.0% | 4.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 23 | 9 | 14 | 39.1% | 60.9% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 22 | 8 | 14 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Former Countries Moderate sample | 20 | 20 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 17 | 14 | 3 | 82.4% | 17.6% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 15 | 12 | 3 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 12 | 11 | 1 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Kosovo Moderate sample | 11 | 9 | 2 | 81.8% | 18.2% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details |
Total decisions
317
Grants
278
Denials
39
Total decisions
184
Grants
142
Denials
42
Total decisions
88
Grants
77
Denials
11
Total decisions
48
Grants
22
Denials
26
Total decisions
47
Grants
46
Denials
1
Total decisions
28
Grants
28
Denials
0
Total decisions
26
Grants
6
Denials
20
Total decisions
25
Grants
24
Denials
1
Total decisions
23
Grants
9
Denials
14
Total decisions
22
Grants
8
Denials
14
Total decisions
20
Grants
20
Denials
0
Total decisions
17
Grants
14
Denials
3
Total decisions
15
Grants
12
Denials
3
Total decisions
12
Grants
11
Denials
1
Total decisions
11
Grants
9
Denials
2
Total decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.