Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
82
Grants
74
Denials
8
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
42.6%
129 / 303
Total decisions
303
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
42.6%
Grants: 129
Denial rate
57.4%
Denials: 174
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Edward F. Lee as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Lee earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1978 from the University of California at Irvineand a Juris Doctor in 1983 from the University of California, Hastings College of Law. From 1996 to 2020, he served as a judge for the California Superior Court, in Santa Clara County.From 1992 to 1996, he served as a municipal court judge for the Santa Clara County Judicial District, California. From 1984 to 1992, he served as senior trial attorney for the Office of the District Attorney, County of Santa Clara, California. Judge Lee is a member of the State Barof California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Edward Lee.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 82 | 74 | 8 | 90.2% | 9.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 59 | 11 | 48 | 18.6% | 81.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 46 | 2 | 44 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 36 | 0 | 36 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 18 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 18 | 7 | 11 | 38.9% | 61.1% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Indonesia Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Argentina Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Kenya Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
82
Grants
74
Denials
8
Total decisions
59
Grants
11
Denials
48
Total decisions
46
Grants
2
Denials
44
Total decisions
36
Grants
0
Denials
36
Total decisions
18
Grants
3
Denials
15
Total decisions
18
Grants
7
Denials
11
Total decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.