Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
554
Grants
488
Denials
66
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
77.8%
1210 / 1556
Total decisions
1556
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
77.8%
Grants: 1210
Denial rate
22.2%
Denials: 346
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Former Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Maria Lurye to begin hearing cases in April 2017. Judge Lurye earned a Bachelor of Science degree in 2001 from Rutgers University–New Brunswick and a Juris Doctor in 2007 from the Rutgers School of Law–Newark. From 2008 to January 2017, she served as an assistant chief counsel for the Office of the Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security in New York, N.Y. She was previously an associate attorney with the Kuba Law Firm in New York City. Judge Lurye is a member of the New Jersey and New York State Bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Maria Lurye.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 554 | 488 | 66 | 88.1% | 11.9% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 175 | 140 | 35 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 122 | 57 | 65 | 46.7% | 53.3% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 98 | 60 | 38 | 61.2% | 38.8% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 89 | 80 | 9 | 89.9% | 10.1% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 70 | 58 | 12 | 82.9% | 17.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 66 | 21 | 45 | 31.8% | 68.2% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 40 | 19 | 21 | 47.5% | 52.5% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 38 | 34 | 4 | 89.5% | 10.5% | View details | |
Pakistan Sufficient sample | 33 | 30 | 3 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Former Countries Moderate sample | 28 | 26 | 2 | 92.9% | 7.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 24 | 22 | 2 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 16 | 14 | 2 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 13 | 10 | 3 | 76.9% | 23.1% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Moderate sample | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Moderate sample | 11 | 10 | 1 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
554
Grants
488
Denials
66
Total decisions
175
Grants
140
Denials
35
Total decisions
122
Grants
57
Denials
65
Total decisions
98
Grants
60
Denials
38
Total decisions
89
Grants
80
Denials
9
Total decisions
70
Grants
58
Denials
12
Total decisions
66
Grants
21
Denials
45
Total decisions
40
Grants
19
Denials
21
Total decisions
38
Grants
34
Denials
4
Total decisions
33
Grants
30
Denials
3
Total decisions
28
Grants
26
Denials
2
Total decisions
24
Grants
22
Denials
2
Total decisions
16
Grants
14
Denials
2
Total decisions
13
Grants
10
Denials
3
Total decisions
12
Grants
12
Denials
0
Total decisions
11
Grants
10
Denials
1
Total decisions
10
Grants
10
Denials
0
Total decisions
10
Grants
9
Denials
1
Total decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
Total decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.