Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
135
Grants
1
Denials
134
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
7.9%
64 / 813
Total decisions
813
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
7.9%
Grants: 64
Denial rate
92.1%
Denials: 749
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Jennifer A. May to begin hearing cases in October 2018. Judge May earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1992 from William Jewell College and a Juris Doctor in 1996 from the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law. From 2006 to 2018,she served as an assistant chief counsel for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Departmentof Homeland Security, in Kansas City, Missouri. From 1999 to 2006, she was an assistantprosecuting attorney for the Clay County Prosecutor’s Office, Family Support Division, in Liberty, Missouri. From 1996 to 1999, she was an assistant prosecuting attorney for the Lafayette County Prosecutor’s Office in Lexington, Missouri. Judge May is a member of the Kansas Bar and Missouri Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jennifer A May.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 135 | 1 | 134 | 0.7% | 99.3% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 112 | 1 | 111 | 0.9% | 99.1% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 81 | 13 | 68 | 16.0% | 84.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 65 | 1 | 64 | 1.5% | 98.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 46 | 0 | 46 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 37 | 2 | 35 | 5.4% | 94.6% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 33 | 10 | 23 | 30.3% | 69.7% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 30 | 3 | 27 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 29 | 2 | 27 | 6.9% | 93.1% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 16 | 2 | 14 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 15 | 5 | 10 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
135
Grants
1
Denials
134
Total decisions
112
Grants
1
Denials
111
Total decisions
81
Grants
13
Denials
68
Total decisions
65
Grants
1
Denials
64
Total decisions
46
Grants
0
Denials
46
Total decisions
37
Grants
2
Denials
35
Total decisions
33
Grants
10
Denials
23
Total decisions
30
Grants
3
Denials
27
Total decisions
29
Grants
2
Denials
27
Total decisions
21
Grants
0
Denials
21
Total decisions
19
Grants
0
Denials
19
Total decisions
16
Grants
2
Denials
14
Total decisions
15
Grants
5
Denials
10
Total decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Total decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Total decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
5
Denials
3
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.