Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
22
Denials
28
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
38.9%
124 / 319
Total decisions
319
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
38.9%
Grants: 124
Denial rate
61.1%
Denials: 195
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Elizabeth Kohler Maya was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Kohler Maya earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1995 from the College of Mount Saint Vincent and a Juris Doctor in 2002 from the George Mason University Antonin Scalia School of Law. From 2011 to 2023, she was a practicing immigration attorney and managing partner at Bromberg, Kohler Maya & Petre PLLC. From 2003 to 2011, she practiced immigration law with the Law Offices of Richard S. Bromberg. From 2002 to 2003, she served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Glen E. Conrad of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia. Judge Kohler Maya is a member of the District of Columbia Bar and Virginia State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Elizabeth Kohler Maya.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 50 | 22 | 28 | 44.0% | 56.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 48 | 30 | 18 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 26 | 8 | 18 | 30.8% | 69.2% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 26 | 4 | 22 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 25 | 1 | 24 | 4.0% | 96.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 16 | 7 | 9 | 43.8% | 56.3% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 14 | 8 | 6 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Djibouti Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
50
Grants
22
Denials
28
Total decisions
48
Grants
30
Denials
18
Total decisions
26
Grants
8
Denials
18
Total decisions
26
Grants
4
Denials
22
Total decisions
25
Grants
1
Denials
24
Total decisions
16
Grants
7
Denials
9
Total decisions
15
Grants
2
Denials
13
Total decisions
14
Grants
8
Denials
6
Total decisions
13
Grants
2
Denials
11
Total decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Total decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.