Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
455
Grants
116
Denials
339
Grant rate: 25.5%Denial rate: 74.5%
Immigration judge
James M McCarthy
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
37.8%
741 / 1958
Total decisions
1958
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
37.8%
Grants: 741
Denial rate
62.2%
Denials: 1217
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed James M. Mc Carthy to begin hearing cases in July 2017. Judge Mc Carthy earned a Bachelor of Science degree in 1983 from St. John’s University and a Juris Doctor in 1995 from Brooklyn Law School. From 2014 to 2017, he served as a senior attorney for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in New York, N.Y. From 2011 to 2014, he served as a deputy chief counsel for the Office of Chief Counsel, ICE, DHS, also in New York. From 2009 to 2011, he served as a senior attorney for ICE, DHS, in Eloy, Ariz. From 2004 to 2009, he served as an assistant chief counsel for ICE, DHS, in Eloy and Florence, Ariz. From 2000 to 2004, he served as an examining attorney for the Mayoral Commission to Combat Police Corruption, New York City Department of Investigations. From 1995 to 2000, he served as an assistant district attorney, and later as a senior assistant district attorney, at the Kings County District Attorney’s Office, in Brooklyn, N.Y. Judge Mc Carthy is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants741 / 1958
Denials1217 / 1958
Other relief0 / 1958
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to James M McCarthy.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 455 | 116 | 339 | 25.5% | 74.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 281 | 101 | 180 | 35.9% | 64.1% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 199 | 154 | 45 | 77.4% | 22.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 173 | 43 | 130 | 24.9% | 75.1% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 105 | 54 | 51 | 51.4% | 48.6% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 85 | 16 | 69 | 18.8% | 81.2% | View details | |
Guinea Sufficient sample | 80 | 20 | 60 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Singapore Sufficient sample | 79 | 5 | 74 | 6.3% | 93.7% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 50 | 27 | 23 | 54.0% | 46.0% | View details | |
Ghana Sufficient sample | 42 | 23 | 19 | 54.8% | 45.2% | View details | |
Bolivia Sufficient sample | 31 | 14 | 17 | 45.2% | 54.8% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 27 | 9 | 18 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 25 | 20 | 5 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 23 | 3 | 20 | 13.0% | 87.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 22 | 5 | 17 | 22.7% | 77.3% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 20 | 6 | 14 | 30.0% | 70.0% | View details | |
Kosovo Moderate sample | 18 | 13 | 5 | 72.2% | 27.8% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 18 | 8 | 10 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 17 | 11 | 6 | 64.7% | 35.3% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 15 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details |
View details
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
281
Grants
101
Denials
180
Grant rate: 35.9%Denial rate: 64.1%
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
199
Grants
154
Denials
45
Grant rate: 77.4%Denial rate: 22.6%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
173
Grants
43
Denials
130
Grant rate: 24.9%Denial rate: 75.1%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
105
Grants
54
Denials
51
Grant rate: 51.4%Denial rate: 48.6%
Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
85
Grants
16
Denials
69
Grant rate: 18.8%Denial rate: 81.2%
Guinea
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
80
Grants
20
Denials
60
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Singapore
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
79
Grants
5
Denials
74
Grant rate: 6.3%Denial rate: 93.7%
Bulgaria
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
27
Denials
23
Grant rate: 54.0%Denial rate: 46.0%
Ghana
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
23
Denials
19
Grant rate: 54.8%Denial rate: 45.2%
Bolivia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
14
Denials
17
Grant rate: 45.2%Denial rate: 54.8%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
9
Denials
18
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Nepal
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
20
Denials
5
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
3
Denials
20
Grant rate: 13.0%Denial rate: 87.0%
Mauritania
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
5
Denials
17
Grant rate: 22.7%Denial rate: 77.3%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
6
Denials
14
Grant rate: 30.0%Denial rate: 70.0%
Kosovo
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
13
Denials
5
Grant rate: 72.2%Denial rate: 27.8%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
8
Denials
10
Grant rate: 44.4%Denial rate: 55.6%
Albania
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
11
Denials
6
Grant rate: 64.7%Denial rate: 35.3%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
1
Denials
14
Grant rate: 6.7%Denial rate: 93.3%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Lori Adams
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 79.5%
- Denial Rate
- 20.5%
Matthew T. Adrian
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 51.3%
- Denial Rate
- 48.7%
H. Jere Armstrong
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.3%
- Denial Rate
- 66.7%
Terry A. Bain
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 87.6%
- Denial Rate
- 12.4%
Susan M Beschta
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 81.3%
- Denial Rate
- 18.8%
Noel A Brennan
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 87.6%
- Denial Rate
- 12.4%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.