Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
199
Grants
168
Denials
31
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
56.9%
456 / 802
Total decisions
802
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
56.9%
Grants: 456
Denial rate
43.1%
Denials: 346
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
William H. Mc Dermott was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in April 2021. Judge Mc Dermott earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2007 from Long Island University and a Juris Doctor in 2011 from The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law. From 2019 to 2021, he served as the Deputy State’s Attorney for Wicomico County, Maryland. From 2011 to 2019, he served as an Assistant State’s Attorney, Deputy State’s Attorney, and Ad Interim State’s Attorney, in Worcester County, Maryland. Judge Mc Dermott is a member of the Maryland State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to William McDermott.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 199 | 168 | 31 | 84.4% | 15.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 100 | 63 | 37 | 63.0% | 37.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 56 | 42 | 14 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 51 | 25 | 26 | 49.0% | 51.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 40 | 4 | 36 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 40 | 25 | 15 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 32 | 24 | 8 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 16 | 15 | 1 | 93.8% | 6.3% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 14 | 1 | 13 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 14 | 1 | 13 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Liechtenstein Moderate sample | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
Total decisions
199
Grants
168
Denials
31
Total decisions
100
Grants
63
Denials
37
Total decisions
56
Grants
42
Denials
14
Total decisions
51
Grants
25
Denials
26
Total decisions
40
Grants
4
Denials
36
Total decisions
40
Grants
25
Denials
15
Total decisions
32
Grants
24
Denials
8
Total decisions
27
Grants
0
Denials
27
Total decisions
24
Grants
0
Denials
24
Total decisions
16
Grants
15
Denials
1
Total decisions
14
Grants
1
Denials
13
Total decisions
14
Grants
1
Denials
13
Total decisions
11
Grants
3
Denials
8
Total decisions
11
Grants
3
Denials
8
Total decisions
10
Grants
5
Denials
5
Total decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Total decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Total decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Total decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.