Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
746
Grants
14
Denials
732
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
3.8%
58 / 1539
Total decisions
1539
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
3.8%
Grants: 58
Denial rate
96.2%
Denials: 1481
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Abby L. Meyer to begin hearing cases in October 2018. Judge Meyer earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2004 from Simpson College and a Juris Doctorin 2007 from the University of Nebraska College of Law. From 2010 to 2018, she served as anassistant chief counsel for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Atlanta and in Omaha, Nebraska. From 2007 to 2010, she was animmigration services officer for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS, in Fairfax,Virginia. Judge Meyer is a member of the Virginia State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Abby L Meyer.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 746 | 14 | 732 | 1.9% | 98.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 232 | 9 | 223 | 3.9% | 96.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 196 | 1 | 195 | 0.5% | 99.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 182 | 8 | 174 | 4.4% | 95.6% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 76.9% | View details | |
Romania Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Bahrain Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
746
Grants
14
Denials
732
Total decisions
232
Grants
9
Denials
223
Total decisions
196
Grants
1
Denials
195
Total decisions
182
Grants
8
Denials
174
Total decisions
21
Grants
0
Denials
21
Total decisions
13
Grants
3
Denials
10
Total decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Total decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Total decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.