Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
236
Grants
27
Denials
209
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
47.0%
470 / 1001
Total decisions
1001
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
47.0%
Grants: 470
Denial rate
53.0%
Denials: 531
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Thomas J. Mungoven as an Immigration Judge in October 2020. Judge Mungoven earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2001 from Hunter College and a Juris Doctor in 2004 from Saint John’s University School of Law. From 2004 to 2020, he was inprivate practice as the founder and lead attorney of Mungoven & Associates PC, in New York.From 2004 to 2008, he served as a staff attorney at Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Newark Immigrant and Refugee Services Division. Judge Mungoven is a member of the New Jersey State Bar and the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Thomas Mungoven.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 236 | 27 | 209 | 11.4% | 88.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 132 | 90 | 42 | 68.2% | 31.8% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 78 | 69 | 9 | 88.5% | 11.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 69 | 18 | 51 | 26.1% | 73.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 67 | 13 | 54 | 19.4% | 80.6% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 49 | 7 | 42 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 44 | 43 | 1 | 97.7% | 2.3% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 41 | 8 | 33 | 19.5% | 80.5% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 36 | 21 | 15 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
Turkiye Sufficient sample | 32 | 23 | 9 | 71.9% | 28.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 23 | 19 | 4 | 82.6% | 17.4% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 21 | 6 | 15 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% | 7.7% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 12 | 10 | 2 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 11 | 10 | 1 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details |
Total decisions
236
Grants
27
Denials
209
Total decisions
132
Grants
90
Denials
42
Total decisions
78
Grants
69
Denials
9
Total decisions
69
Grants
18
Denials
51
Total decisions
67
Grants
13
Denials
54
Total decisions
49
Grants
7
Denials
42
Total decisions
44
Grants
43
Denials
1
Total decisions
41
Grants
8
Denials
33
Total decisions
36
Grants
21
Denials
15
Total decisions
32
Grants
23
Denials
9
Total decisions
23
Grants
19
Denials
4
Total decisions
21
Grants
6
Denials
15
Total decisions
13
Grants
12
Denials
1
Total decisions
12
Grants
10
Denials
2
Total decisions
12
Grants
12
Denials
0
Total decisions
11
Grants
10
Denials
1
Total decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Total decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.