Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
151
Grants
36
Denials
115
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
44.0%
169 / 384
Total decisions
384
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
44.0%
Grants: 169
Denial rate
56.0%
Denials: 215
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Angela Munro was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2023. Judge Munro earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2000 from Brown University, a Master of Arts in 2004 from the Fletcher School at Tufts University, and a Juris Doctor in 2008 from Northeastern University School of Law. From 2010 to 2023, she served as an attorney advisor at the Board of Immigration Appeals, EOIR. From 2008 to 2010, she served as a judicial law clerk at the Boston Immigration Court entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. Judge Munro is a member of the Massachusetts Bar and the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Angela Munro.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 151 | 36 | 115 | 23.8% | 76.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 50 | 31 | 19 | 62.0% | 38.0% | View details | |
Angola Sufficient sample | 31 | 27 | 4 | 87.1% | 12.9% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 30 | 8 | 22 | 26.7% | 73.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 28 | 13 | 15 | 46.4% | 53.6% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 15 | 6 | 9 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 14 | 7 | 7 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Moderate sample | 11 | 9 | 2 | 81.8% | 18.2% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
India Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Belarus Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Senegal Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Unknown Nationality Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kenya Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
South Africa Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Moldova Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
St. Pierre & Miquelon Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
151
Grants
36
Denials
115
Total decisions
50
Grants
31
Denials
19
Total decisions
31
Grants
27
Denials
4
Total decisions
30
Grants
8
Denials
22
Total decisions
28
Grants
13
Denials
15
Total decisions
15
Grants
6
Denials
9
Total decisions
14
Grants
7
Denials
7
Total decisions
11
Grants
9
Denials
2
Total decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.