Guatemala
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
5
Denials
17
Grant rate: 22.7%Denial rate: 77.3%
Immigration judge
George R Najjar
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
46.0%
69 / 150
Total decisions
150
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
46.0%
Grants: 69
Denial rate
54.0%
Denials: 81
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
George R. Najjar was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in August 2023. Judge Najjar earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1983 from the University of California, Berkeley, and a Juris Doctor in 1990 from California Western School of Law. From 1993 to 2023, he was in private practice in San Diego, California. During this time, from 2000 to 2023, he served as a judge pro tempore in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, and from 1997 to 2023, he served as an arbitrator for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. Judge Najjar is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants69 / 150
Denials81 / 150
Other relief0 / 150
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to George R Najjar.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Moderate sample | 22 | 5 | 17 | 22.7% | 77.3% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 20 | 16 | 4 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% | 70.6% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Jordan Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
16
Denials
4
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
5
Denials
12
Grant rate: 29.4%Denial rate: 70.6%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Grant rate: 88.9%Denial rate: 11.1%
Venezuela
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
Grant rate: 44.4%Denial rate: 55.6%
Peru
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Armenia
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Iraq
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Turkiye
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Iran
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Angola
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Guinea
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Spain
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Eritrea
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Jordan
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Mauritania
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Amelia Anderson
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.1%
- Denial Rate
- 66.9%
Anthony Atenaide
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 26.7%
- Denial Rate
- 73.3%
Olga E Attia
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 18.3%
- Denial Rate
- 81.7%
Kenneth A. Bagley
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 19.1%
- Denial Rate
- 80.8%
Robert J. Barrett
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 34.1%
- Denial Rate
- 65.9%
Rico J. Bartolomei
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.9%
- Denial Rate
- 66.1%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.