Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
232
Grants
3
Denials
229
Grant rate: 1.3%Denial rate: 98.7%
Immigration judge
Dania Nassar
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
36.0%
411 / 1143
Total decisions
1143
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
36.0%
Grants: 411
Denial rate
64.0%
Denials: 732
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Dania Nassar was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Nassar earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2007 from the University of Texas at Austin and a Juris Doctor in 2011 from South Texas College of Law in Houston. From 2021 to 2022, Judge Nassar served as a supervising administrative law judge and from 2017 to 2021, she served as an administrative law judge at the New York State Office of Children and Family Services – Bureau of Special Hearings in New York City. From 2014 to 2017, Judge Nassar served as an agency attorney for the New York City Administration for Children's Services in Brooklyn, New York. From 2013 to 2014, she was of counsel to a private immigration law firm in New York City. In 2011, she was a legal fellow at Amnesty International – USA in New York City. Judge Nassar is a member of the New York State Bar and the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants411 / 1143
Denials732 / 1143
Other relief0 / 1143
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Dania Nassar.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 232 | 3 | 229 | 1.3% | 98.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 171 | 127 | 44 | 74.3% | 25.7% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 82 | 33 | 49 | 40.2% | 59.8% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 81 | 10 | 71 | 12.3% | 87.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 75 | 7 | 68 | 9.3% | 90.7% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 64 | 53 | 11 | 82.8% | 17.2% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 49 | 31 | 18 | 63.3% | 36.7% | View details | |
Georgia Sufficient sample | 49 | 29 | 20 | 59.2% | 40.8% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 27 | 1 | 26 | 3.7% | 96.3% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 25 | 2 | 23 | 8.0% | 92.0% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 25 | 15 | 10 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 23 | 5 | 18 | 21.7% | 78.3% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 19 | 8 | 11 | 42.1% | 57.9% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 17 | 3 | 14 | 17.6% | 82.4% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 16 | 1 | 15 | 6.3% | 93.8% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 15 | 6 | 9 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details |
View details
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
171
Grants
127
Denials
44
Grant rate: 74.3%Denial rate: 25.7%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
82
Grants
33
Denials
49
Grant rate: 40.2%Denial rate: 59.8%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
81
Grants
10
Denials
71
Grant rate: 12.3%Denial rate: 87.7%
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
75
Grants
7
Denials
68
Grant rate: 9.3%Denial rate: 90.7%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
64
Grants
53
Denials
11
Grant rate: 82.8%Denial rate: 17.2%
Bulgaria
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
49
Grants
31
Denials
18
Grant rate: 63.3%Denial rate: 36.7%
Georgia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
49
Grants
29
Denials
20
Grant rate: 59.2%Denial rate: 40.8%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
1
Denials
26
Grant rate: 3.7%Denial rate: 96.3%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
2
Denials
23
Grant rate: 8.0%Denial rate: 92.0%
Nepal
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
15
Denials
10
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
5
Denials
18
Grant rate: 21.7%Denial rate: 78.3%
Guinea
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
8
Denials
11
Grant rate: 42.1%Denial rate: 57.9%
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
3
Denials
14
Grant rate: 17.6%Denial rate: 82.4%
Dominican Republic
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
1
Denials
15
Grant rate: 6.3%Denial rate: 93.8%
Jamaica
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
6
Denials
9
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Guatemala
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
2
Denials
11
Grant rate: 15.4%Denial rate: 84.6%
Singapore
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Uzbekistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Grant rate: 8.3%Denial rate: 91.7%
Turkiye
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Grant rate: 45.5%Denial rate: 54.5%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Lori Adams
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 79.5%
- Denial Rate
- 20.5%
Matthew T. Adrian
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 51.3%
- Denial Rate
- 48.7%
H. Jere Armstrong
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.3%
- Denial Rate
- 66.7%
Terry A. Bain
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 87.6%
- Denial Rate
- 12.4%
Susan M Beschta
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 81.3%
- Denial Rate
- 18.8%
Noel A Brennan
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 87.6%
- Denial Rate
- 12.4%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.