Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
430
Grants
11
Denials
419
Grant rate: 2.6%Denial rate: 97.4%
Immigration judge
Julie L Nelson
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
18.2%
205 / 1126
Total decisions
1126
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
18.2%
Grants: 205
Denial rate
81.8%
Denials: 921
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Julie Nelson to begin hearing cases in February 2017. Judge Nelson earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 2003 from Biola University and a Juris Doctor in 2006 from California Western School of Law. From December 2014 to January 2017, and previously from 2009 through May 2014, she served as an assistant chief counsel for the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Eloy, Az. From June 2014 to November 2014, she served as a judicial law clerk for the Honorable Steven P. Logan, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. From 2008 through 2009, she served as an attorney advisor for the Los Angeles Immigration Court, Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), DOJ. From 2007 through 2008, she served as a judicial law clerk for the San Diego Immigration Court, EOIR, DOJ, entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. From 2007 through 2009, she served on the faculty of Biola University as an adjunct professor. Judge Nelson is a member of State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants205 / 1126
Denials921 / 1126
Other relief0 / 1126
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Julie L Nelson.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 430 | 11 | 419 | 2.6% | 97.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 143 | 37 | 106 | 25.9% | 74.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 126 | 13 | 113 | 10.3% | 89.7% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 93 | 28 | 65 | 30.1% | 69.9% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 66 | 12 | 54 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 40 | 8 | 32 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 36 | 28 | 8 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 27 | 7 | 20 | 25.9% | 74.1% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 25 | 1 | 24 | 4.0% | 96.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 24 | 12 | 12 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 17 | 16 | 1 | 94.1% | 5.9% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details |
View details
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
143
Grants
37
Denials
106
Grant rate: 25.9%Denial rate: 74.1%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
126
Grants
13
Denials
113
Grant rate: 10.3%Denial rate: 89.7%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
93
Grants
28
Denials
65
Grant rate: 30.1%Denial rate: 69.9%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
66
Grants
12
Denials
54
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
40
Grants
8
Denials
32
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Cameroon
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
28
Denials
8
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
7
Denials
20
Grant rate: 25.9%Denial rate: 74.1%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
1
Denials
24
Grant rate: 4.0%Denial rate: 96.0%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
12
Denials
12
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Eritrea
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
16
Denials
1
Grant rate: 94.1%Denial rate: 5.9%
Armenia
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Cuba
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Romania
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Iran
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
Nepal
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Dominican Republic
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Victoria L. Argumedo
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.5%
- Denial Rate
- 95.5%
Samantha Begovich
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 16.8%
- Denial Rate
- 83.2%
Jeffrey J. Bernstein
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.8%
- Denial Rate
- 91.2%
Elisa C Brasil
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 88.3%
- Denial Rate
- 11.7%
Jeremy J Butler
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 69.0%
- Denial Rate
- 31.0%
Andrew J Caborn
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 24.3%
- Denial Rate
- 75.7%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.