Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
7
Denials
10
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
43.5%
63 / 145
Total decisions
145
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
43.5%
Grants: 63
Denial rate
56.5%
Denials: 82
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Kristi Nelson was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Nelson earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1992 from the University of Tulsa and a Juris Doctor in 1995 from De Paul University College of Law. From 2016 to 2023, she was a partner at Gair Eberhard Nelson Dedinas Ltd. in Chicago. During this time in 2018, she served as a volunteer attorney for the Dilley Pro Bono Project, where she represented detained noncitizens in Dilley, Texas. From 2006 to 2016, she was a partner at Chen Nelson Roberts Ltd. in Chicago. In 2005, she served as a law clerk for the Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. In addition to her private practice, from 1998 to 2013, she served as pro bono counsel for National Immigrant Justice Center in Chicago where she represented noncitizens before EOIR. From 1999 to 2004, she was an associate and partner with Freeman, Freeman & Salzman PC; from 1997 to 1999, she was a litigation associate with Dickinson Wright PLLC; and from 1995 to 1997, she was a litigation associate at the law firm Rudnick & Wolfe (now DLA Piper), all in Chicago. Judge Nelson is a member of the Illinois State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Kristi Nelson.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Moderate sample | 17 | 7 | 10 | 41.2% | 58.8% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 14 | 14 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 12 | 2 | 10 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Tonga Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
Total decisions
17
Grants
7
Denials
10
Total decisions
14
Grants
14
Denials
0
Total decisions
12
Grants
2
Denials
10
Total decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.