Cuba
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
299
Grants
278
Denials
21
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
46.9%
469 / 1001
Total decisions
1001
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
46.9%
Grants: 469
Denial rate
53.1%
Denials: 532
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Former Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed An Mai Nguyen to begin hearing cases in April 2017. Judge Nguyen earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1996 from the University of Southern California and a Juris Doctor in 2000 from Southwestern Law School. From March 2007 to March 2017, she served as an assistant chief counsel for the Office of Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Las Vegas, Nev. During this post, she served as special assistant U.S. attorney for the District of Nevada from 2009 to 2011. From 2000 through 2003, she served as an assistant district counsel for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, in Los Angeles, entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. Judge Nguyen is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to An Mai Nguyen.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cuba Sufficient sample | 299 | 278 | 21 | 93.0% | 7.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 158 | 12 | 146 | 7.6% | 92.4% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 134 | 4 | 130 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 92 | 3 | 89 | 3.3% | 96.7% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 67 | 51 | 16 | 76.1% | 23.9% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 60 | 8 | 52 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 49 | 38 | 11 | 77.6% | 22.4% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 28 | 22 | 6 | 78.6% | 21.4% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 16 | 1 | 15 | 6.3% | 93.8% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
India Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bermuda Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details |
Total decisions
299
Grants
278
Denials
21
Total decisions
158
Grants
12
Denials
146
Total decisions
134
Grants
4
Denials
130
Total decisions
92
Grants
3
Denials
89
Total decisions
67
Grants
51
Denials
16
Total decisions
60
Grants
8
Denials
52
Total decisions
49
Grants
38
Denials
11
Total decisions
28
Grants
22
Denials
6
Total decisions
16
Grants
1
Denials
15
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.