Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
122
Grants
4
Denials
118
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
12.9%
60 / 466
Total decisions
466
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
12.9%
Grants: 60
Denial rate
87.1%
Denials: 406
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Jonathan W. Owens to begin hearing cases in August 2018. Judge Owens earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1997 from the University of Michiganand a Juris Doctor in 2005from Michigan State University, Detroit College of Law. From 2014to 2018, he was an administrative law judge (ALJ) manager, and from 2007 to 2014, he was an ALJ both for the State of Michigan Licensing and Regulatory Affairs in Detroit. From 2003 to 2007, he was departmental analyst for the Office of Child Support, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. Judge Owens is a member of the State Bar of Michigan.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jonathan W Owens.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 122 | 4 | 118 | 3.3% | 96.7% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 80 | 4 | 76 | 5.0% | 95.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 51 | 5 | 46 | 9.8% | 90.2% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 28 | 0 | 28 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 22 | 7 | 15 | 31.8% | 68.2% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 17 | 9 | 8 | 52.9% | 47.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 13 | 8 | 5 | 61.5% | 38.5% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Somalia Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
122
Grants
4
Denials
118
Total decisions
80
Grants
4
Denials
76
Total decisions
51
Grants
5
Denials
46
Total decisions
32
Grants
0
Denials
32
Total decisions
28
Grants
0
Denials
28
Total decisions
22
Grants
7
Denials
15
Total decisions
17
Grants
9
Denials
8
Total decisions
13
Grants
8
Denials
5
Total decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Total decisions
11
Grants
3
Denials
8
Total decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.