Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
111
Grants
27
Denials
84
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
19.7%
93 / 473
Total decisions
473
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
19.7%
Grants: 93
Denial rate
80.3%
Denials: 380
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Adam G. Panopoulos was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in December 2022. Judge Panopoulos earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2006 from the University of Pennsylvania and a Juris Doctor in 2010 from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. From 2014 to 2022, he served as an assistant chief counsel, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in New York City. From 2012 to 2014, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Harlingen suboffice, San Antonio, in Harlingen, Texas. From 2010 to 2012, he served as a judicial law clerk, and later as an attorney advisor, at the Atlanta Immigration Court entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. Judge Panopoulos is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Adam Panopoulos.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 111 | 27 | 84 | 24.3% | 75.7% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 51 | 12 | 39 | 23.5% | 76.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 44 | 2 | 42 | 4.5% | 95.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 37 | 10 | 27 | 27.0% | 73.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 27 | 11 | 16 | 40.7% | 59.3% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 26 | 2 | 24 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 21 | 5 | 16 | 23.8% | 76.2% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 76.9% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Congo - Kinshasa Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details |
Total decisions
111
Grants
27
Denials
84
Total decisions
51
Grants
12
Denials
39
Total decisions
44
Grants
2
Denials
42
Total decisions
37
Grants
10
Denials
27
Total decisions
27
Grants
11
Denials
16
Total decisions
26
Grants
2
Denials
24
Total decisions
24
Grants
0
Denials
24
Total decisions
21
Grants
5
Denials
16
Total decisions
16
Grants
0
Denials
16
Total decisions
13
Grants
3
Denials
10
Total decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.