Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
457
Grants
162
Denials
295
Grant rate: 35.4%Denial rate: 64.6%
Immigration judge
Roopal Patel
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
38.8%
294 / 758
Total decisions
758
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
38.8%
Grants: 294
Denial rate
61.2%
Denials: 464
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Roopal B. Patel was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2024. Judge Patel earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 from Harvard University and a Juris Doctor in 2011 from New York University School of Law. From 2014 to 2024, she was a senior staff attorney at Manhattan Legal Services where she worked on a wide variety of cases, including immigration cases. From 2011 to 2013, she was a staff attorney at the Brennan Center for Justice. Judge Patel is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants294 / 758
Denials464 / 758
Other relief0 / 758
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Roopal Patel.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 457 | 162 | 295 | 35.4% | 64.6% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 65 | 21 | 44 | 32.3% | 67.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 51 | 25 | 26 | 49.0% | 51.0% | View details | |
Angola Sufficient sample | 39 | 26 | 13 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 30 | 8 | 22 | 26.7% | 73.3% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 27 | 11 | 16 | 40.7% | 59.3% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 22 | 11 | 11 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 11 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
India Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Unknown Nationality Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
St. Pierre & Miquelon Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Côte d’Ivoire Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
65
Grants
21
Denials
44
Grant rate: 32.3%Denial rate: 67.7%
Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
51
Grants
25
Denials
26
Grant rate: 49.0%Denial rate: 51.0%
Angola
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
39
Grants
26
Denials
13
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
8
Denials
22
Grant rate: 26.7%Denial rate: 73.3%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
11
Denials
16
Grant rate: 40.7%Denial rate: 59.3%
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
11
Denials
11
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Haiti
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
6
Denials
5
Grant rate: 54.5%Denial rate: 45.5%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Niue
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Unknown Nationality
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Belize
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Nicaragua
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
St. Pierre & Miquelon
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Turkiye
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Uganda
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Côte d’Ivoire
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Cuba
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Steven V. Adler
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 66.1%
- Denial Rate
- 33.9%
Sarah Cade
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 48.5%
- Denial Rate
- 51.5%
Francis L. Cramer
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.9%
- Denial Rate
- 60.1%
Billino W D'Ambrosio
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 7.9%
- Denial Rate
- 92.1%
Matthew J. D'Angelo
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 50.7%
- Denial Rate
- 49.3%
Steven F. Day
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 21.8%
- Denial Rate
- 78.2%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.