Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
426
Grants
377
Denials
49
Grant rate: 88.5%Denial rate: 11.5%
Immigration judge
Susan Phan
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
55.5%
1248 / 2250
Total decisions
2250
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
55.5%
Grants: 1248
Denial rate
44.5%
Denials: 1002
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Susan Phan to begin hearing cases in May 2019.Judge Phan earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2001 and a Juris Doctor in 2004, both from the University of California, Los Angeles. From 2015 to 2019, she served as an assistant chiefcounsel for the Office of the Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Departmentof Homeland Security, in San Francisco, California. From 2012 to 2015, she served as anassistant general counsel for the State Bar of California, in San Francisco. From 2009 to 2014,she served as a special assistant U.S. attorney and assistant U.S. attorney for the Northern District of California in San Francisco, and for the Eastern District of California in Fresno. From 2005 to 2009, she served as an assistant attorney general with the District of Columbia Attorney General’s Office in Washington, D.C. Judge Phan is a member of the California State Bar and District of Columbia Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants1248 / 2250
Denials1002 / 2250
Other relief0 / 2250
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Susan Phan.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Russia Sufficient sample | 426 | 377 | 49 | 88.5% | 11.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 370 | 179 | 191 | 48.4% | 51.6% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 358 | 86 | 272 | 24.0% | 76.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 268 | 98 | 170 | 36.6% | 63.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 189 | 60 | 129 | 31.7% | 68.3% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 163 | 73 | 90 | 44.8% | 55.2% | View details | |
Afghanistan Sufficient sample | 147 | 136 | 11 | 92.5% | 7.5% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 65 | 47 | 18 | 72.3% | 27.7% | View details | |
Ukraine Sufficient sample | 32 | 26 | 6 | 81.3% | 18.8% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 31 | 15 | 16 | 48.4% | 51.6% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 30 | 10 | 20 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 19 | 17 | 2 | 89.5% | 10.5% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 18 | 17 | 1 | 94.4% | 5.6% | View details | |
Romania Moderate sample | 18 | 17 | 1 | 94.4% | 5.6% | View details | |
Belize Moderate sample | 16 | 14 | 2 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 12 | 7 | 5 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
Vietnam Moderate sample | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details |
View details
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
370
Grants
179
Denials
191
Grant rate: 48.4%Denial rate: 51.6%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
358
Grants
86
Denials
272
Grant rate: 24.0%Denial rate: 76.0%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
268
Grants
98
Denials
170
Grant rate: 36.6%Denial rate: 63.4%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
189
Grants
60
Denials
129
Grant rate: 31.7%Denial rate: 68.3%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
163
Grants
73
Denials
90
Grant rate: 44.8%Denial rate: 55.2%
Afghanistan
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
147
Grants
136
Denials
11
Grant rate: 92.5%Denial rate: 7.5%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
65
Grants
47
Denials
18
Grant rate: 72.3%Denial rate: 27.7%
Ukraine
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
26
Denials
6
Grant rate: 81.3%Denial rate: 18.8%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
15
Denials
16
Grant rate: 48.4%Denial rate: 51.6%
Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
10
Denials
20
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
17
Denials
2
Grant rate: 89.5%Denial rate: 10.5%
Nepal
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
17
Denials
1
Grant rate: 94.4%Denial rate: 5.6%
Romania
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
17
Denials
1
Grant rate: 94.4%Denial rate: 5.6%
Belize
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
14
Denials
2
Grant rate: 87.5%Denial rate: 12.5%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
7
Denials
5
Grant rate: 58.3%Denial rate: 41.7%
Vietnam
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
11
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Eritrea
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Armenia
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Grant rate: 71.4%Denial rate: 28.6%
Pakistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
6
Denials
1
Grant rate: 85.7%Denial rate: 14.3%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Victoria L. Argumedo
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.5%
- Denial Rate
- 95.5%
Samantha Begovich
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 16.8%
- Denial Rate
- 83.2%
Jeffrey J. Bernstein
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.8%
- Denial Rate
- 91.2%
Elisa C Brasil
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 88.3%
- Denial Rate
- 11.7%
Jeremy J Butler
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 69.0%
- Denial Rate
- 31.0%
Andrew J Caborn
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 24.3%
- Denial Rate
- 75.7%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.