Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
163
Grants
144
Denials
19
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
63.3%
516 / 815
Total decisions
815
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
63.3%
Grants: 516
Denial rate
36.7%
Denials: 299
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Gina L. Reynolds was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Reynolds earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1999 from the University of Pittsburgh and a Juris Doctor in 2004 from the University of Notre Dame Law School. From 2009 to 2022, she was an attorney at Hernandez & Reynolds LLC (formerly known as Moises Hernandez, Esq. LLC) in Chicago, and a partner at the same from 2014 to 2022. From 2006 to 2008 she was in private practice in Chicago. From 2003 to 2004 she was a law clerk at the Notre Dame Legal Aid Immigration & Asylum Clinic. Judge Reynolds is a member of the Illinois State Bar and the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Gina Reynolds.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Russia Sufficient sample | 163 | 144 | 19 | 88.3% | 11.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 96 | 48 | 48 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 75 | 45 | 30 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 73 | 26 | 47 | 35.6% | 64.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 73 | 45 | 28 | 61.6% | 38.4% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 59 | 25 | 34 | 42.4% | 57.6% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 35 | 5 | 30 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Moderate sample | 24 | 18 | 6 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 21 | 9 | 12 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 20 | 18 | 2 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 18 | 15 | 3 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 18 | 12 | 6 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Jordan Moderate sample | 12 | 9 | 3 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 12 | 10 | 2 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Belize Moderate sample | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Moldova Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details |
Total decisions
163
Grants
144
Denials
19
Total decisions
96
Grants
48
Denials
48
Total decisions
75
Grants
45
Denials
30
Total decisions
73
Grants
26
Denials
47
Total decisions
73
Grants
45
Denials
28
Total decisions
59
Grants
25
Denials
34
Total decisions
35
Grants
5
Denials
30
Total decisions
24
Grants
18
Denials
6
Total decisions
21
Grants
9
Denials
12
Total decisions
20
Grants
18
Denials
2
Total decisions
18
Grants
15
Denials
3
Total decisions
18
Grants
12
Denials
6
Total decisions
12
Grants
9
Denials
3
Total decisions
12
Grants
10
Denials
2
Total decisions
10
Grants
10
Denials
0
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.