Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
87
Grants
24
Denials
63
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
27.3%
166 / 609
Total decisions
609
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
27.3%
Grants: 166
Denial rate
72.7%
Denials: 443
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Jennifer Margaret Riedthaler Williams to beginhearing cases in May 2019. Judge Riedthaler Williams earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1998 from Baldwin Wallace College, a Juris Doctor in 2001 from Case Western Reserve University Schoolof Law, and a Master of Public Administration in 2006 from Cleveland State University. From 2017 to 2019, she served as a judicial magistrate with the Lorain County Domestic Relations Court in Elyria, Ohio. From 2005 to 2017, she served as an assistant prosecuting attorney withthe Lorain County Prosecutor’s Office in Elyria, Ohio, in the felony criminal division. From 2001 to 2005, she served as an assistant prosecuting attorney in the same office working in thejuvenile and felony non-support division. Judge Riedthaler Williams is a member of the Ohio Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jennifer M Riedthaler-Williams.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 87 | 24 | 63 | 27.6% | 72.4% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 82 | 7 | 75 | 8.5% | 91.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 69 | 6 | 63 | 8.7% | 91.3% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 68 | 43 | 25 | 63.2% | 36.8% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 51 | 17 | 34 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 27 | 12 | 15 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 26 | 2 | 24 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 23 | 1 | 22 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 18 | 8 | 10 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 14 | 2 | 12 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Iraq Moderate sample | 12 | 8 | 4 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Libya Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
87
Grants
24
Denials
63
Total decisions
82
Grants
7
Denials
75
Total decisions
69
Grants
6
Denials
63
Total decisions
68
Grants
43
Denials
25
Total decisions
51
Grants
17
Denials
34
Total decisions
27
Grants
12
Denials
15
Total decisions
26
Grants
2
Denials
24
Total decisions
23
Grants
1
Denials
22
Total decisions
22
Grants
0
Denials
22
Total decisions
18
Grants
8
Denials
10
Total decisions
14
Grants
2
Denials
12
Total decisions
12
Grants
8
Denials
4
Total decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.