Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
196
Grants
9
Denials
187
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
14.3%
108 / 753
Total decisions
753
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
14.3%
Grants: 108
Denial rate
85.7%
Denials: 645
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Teresa L. Riley to begin hearing cases in May 2019.Judge Riley earned a Bachelor of Science in 1997 from the University of Akron, and a Juris Doctor in 2002 from the University of Akron School of Law. From 2009 to 2019, she served asan assistant U.S. attorney, Northern District of Ohio, Department of Justice, in both the Cleveland and Akron offices finishing her service as the Attorney-in-Charge, Criminal Division,of the Akron Branch Office. From 2008 to 2009, she served as an assistant prosecuting attorneyfor the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office in Cleveland, Ohio. From 2003 to 2008, she servedas the senior law clerk in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio. From 1999 to 2003,she served as a law clerk and judicial attorney for Judge John R. Adams in the Court of Common Pleas in Summit County, Ohio. Judge Riley is a member of the Ohio Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Teresa L Riley.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 196 | 9 | 187 | 4.6% | 95.4% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 110 | 7 | 103 | 6.4% | 93.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 101 | 10 | 91 | 9.9% | 90.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 49 | 5 | 44 | 10.2% | 89.8% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 44 | 2 | 42 | 4.5% | 95.5% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 24 | 13 | 11 | 54.2% | 45.8% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 22 | 7 | 15 | 31.8% | 68.2% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 19 | 7 | 12 | 36.8% | 63.2% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 64.7% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46.2% | 53.8% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Somalia Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
196
Grants
9
Denials
187
Total decisions
110
Grants
7
Denials
103
Total decisions
101
Grants
10
Denials
91
Total decisions
49
Grants
5
Denials
44
Total decisions
44
Grants
2
Denials
42
Total decisions
24
Grants
13
Denials
11
Total decisions
22
Grants
7
Denials
15
Total decisions
19
Grants
7
Denials
12
Total decisions
17
Grants
6
Denials
11
Total decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Total decisions
13
Grants
6
Denials
7
Total decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.