Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
0
Denials
42
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
6.0%
9 / 151
Total decisions
151
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
6.0%
Grants: 9
Denial rate
94.0%
Denials: 142
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
David H. Robertson was appointed as a Unit Chief Immigration Judge to begin supervisoryimmigration adjudication center duties and hearing cases in April 2021. Judge Robertson earneda Bachelor of Science in 1986 from James Madison University, a Juris Doctor in 1989 from the University of Richmond School of Law, and a Master of Laws in 1999 from the Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School. From 1990 to 2020, he served as a U.S. Army Judge Advocate in various locations throughout the U.S. and Germany. During that time, from 2010 to 2020, he served as a Military Judge in the following locations: Fort Bliss, Texas; Fort Bragg,North Carolina; Kaiserslautern, Germany; and Fort Stewart, Georgia. While serving as a Military Judge, he also presided over trials in Kuwait and Afghanistan. From 2004 to 2006, he served as a Regional Defense Counsel; from 1999 to 2001, as a Senior Defense Counsel; from 1995 to Communications and Legislative Affairs Division 1997, as a Prosecutor; and from 1993 to 1995, as a Defense Counsel. From 1995 to 1996, hedeployed to Bosnia-Herzegovina, and from 2007 to 2008, he deployed to Kosovo. In 2020, heretired in the rank of Colonel. Judge Robertson is a member of the Virginia State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to David Robertson.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 32 | 2 | 30 | 6.3% | 93.8% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 27 | 1 | 26 | 3.7% | 96.3% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Djibouti Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Lebanon Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Belarus Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
42
Grants
0
Denials
42
Total decisions
32
Grants
2
Denials
30
Total decisions
27
Grants
1
Denials
26
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.