Immigration judge

David Robertson

Community discussion · 0

Public EOIR asylum decision statistics

Status
active
Data source
EOIR Case Data

Grant rate

6.0%

9 / 151

Total decisions

151

Merits decision sample in current public statistics

Grant rate

6.0%

Grants: 9

Denial rate

94.0%

Denials: 142

Other relief rate

0.0%

Other relief: 0

Judge profile

This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.

David H. Robertson was appointed as a Unit Chief Immigration Judge to begin supervisoryimmigration adjudication center duties and hearing cases in April 2021. Judge Robertson earneda Bachelor of Science in 1986 from James Madison University, a Juris Doctor in 1989 from the University of Richmond School of Law, and a Master of Laws in 1999 from the Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School. From 1990 to 2020, he served as a U.S. Army Judge Advocate in various locations throughout the U.S. and Germany. During that time, from 2010 to 2020, he served as a Military Judge in the following locations: Fort Bliss, Texas; Fort Bragg,North Carolina; Kaiserslautern, Germany; and Fort Stewart, Georgia. While serving as a Military Judge, he also presided over trials in Kuwait and Afghanistan. From 2004 to 2006, he served as a Regional Defense Counsel; from 1999 to 2001, as a Senior Defense Counsel; from 1995 to Communications and Legislative Affairs Division 1997, as a Prosecutor; and from 1993 to 1995, as a Defense Counsel. From 1995 to 1996, hedeployed to Bosnia-Herzegovina, and from 2007 to 2008, he deployed to Kosovo. In 2020, heretired in the rank of Colonel. Judge Robertson is a member of the Virginia State Bar.

This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.

Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report

Outcome distribution

Grants9 / 151
Denials142 / 151
Other relief0 / 151

Community perspective

Community discussion

Read public experiences and process discussions related to David Robertson.

0 topics

You can start with these public topics

  • Share a public process or preparation experience
  • Discuss how to interpret public data
  • Ask a question without personal case details

Case details

0 rows

This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Case Ratio

-

Distribution

Showing 0 of 0

View by applicant nationality

Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.

Brazil

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

42

Grants

0

Denials

42

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Guatemala

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

32

Grants

2

Denials

30

Grant rate: 6.3%Denial rate: 93.8%

Spain

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

27

Grants

1

Denials

26

Grant rate: 3.7%Denial rate: 96.3%

Honduras

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

7

Grants

0

Denials

7

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Ecuador

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

0

Denials

6

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Armenia

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

0

Denials

4

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Central African Republic

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

0

Denials

4

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Dominican Republic

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

0

Denials

4

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

India

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

3

Grants

0

Denials

3

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Turkiye

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

3

Grants

0

Denials

3

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Democratic Republic Of Congo

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

1

Denials

1

Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%

Djibouti

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

2

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Lebanon

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

0

Denials

2

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Mexico

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

0

Denials

2

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Uganda

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

1

Denials

1

Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%

Belarus

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

0

Denials

1

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Cuba

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

0

Denials

1

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Egypt

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

0

Denials

1

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Ghana

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

0

Denials

1

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Nicaragua

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

1

Grants

1

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Other judges at the same immigration court

Steven V. Adler

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
66.1%
Denial Rate
33.9%
View details

Sarah Cade

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
48.5%
Denial Rate
51.5%
View details

Francis L. Cramer

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
39.9%
Denial Rate
60.1%
View details

Billino W D'Ambrosio

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
7.9%
Denial Rate
92.1%
View details

Matthew J. D'Angelo

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
50.7%
Denial Rate
49.3%
View details

Steven F. Day

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
21.8%
Denial Rate
78.2%
View details
Disclaimer

This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.