Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
159
Grants
48
Denials
111
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
34.1%
245 / 718
Total decisions
718
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
34.1%
Grants: 245
Denial rate
65.9%
Denials: 473
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed David A. as an immigration judge in March 2020.Judge Russo earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1990 from Tulane University and a Juris Doctor in 1995 from the Louisiana State University School of Law. From 2017 to 2020, he served as adeployable field counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency,Department of Homeland Security, at disaster locations nationwide. From 2011 to 2016, heserved as a deputy state judge advocate for the Georgia National Guard, in Atlanta. From 2008 to 2011, he was a partner with Herman & Russo PC, in Woodstock, Georgia. From 2000 to 2008,he served as a judge advocate for the U.S. Army in the following locations: Ft. Mc Pherson,Georgia; Germany; Iraq; and Kuwait. Judge Russo is a member of the Georgia State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to David Russo.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 159 | 48 | 111 | 30.2% | 69.8% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 139 | 36 | 103 | 25.9% | 74.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 86 | 24 | 62 | 27.9% | 72.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 72 | 49 | 23 | 68.1% | 31.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 62 | 17 | 45 | 27.4% | 72.6% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 41 | 18 | 23 | 43.9% | 56.1% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 27 | 5 | 22 | 18.5% | 81.5% | View details | |
South Africa Moderate sample | 26 | 8 | 18 | 30.8% | 69.2% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 22 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46.2% | 53.8% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details |
Total decisions
159
Grants
48
Denials
111
Total decisions
139
Grants
36
Denials
103
Total decisions
86
Grants
24
Denials
62
Total decisions
72
Grants
49
Denials
23
Total decisions
62
Grants
17
Denials
45
Total decisions
41
Grants
18
Denials
23
Total decisions
27
Grants
5
Denials
22
Total decisions
26
Grants
8
Denials
18
Total decisions
22
Grants
4
Denials
18
Total decisions
13
Grants
6
Denials
7
Total decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.