Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
230
Grants
35
Denials
195
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
35.4%
174 / 491
Total decisions
491
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
35.4%
Grants: 174
Denial rate
64.6%
Denials: 317
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Lucero M. Saldana Mistry was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2023. Judge Saldana Mistry earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2006 from the Florida Atlantic University and a Juris Doctor in 2009 from the Florida Coastal School of Law. From 2017 to 2023, she worked at Frank Hiscock Legal Aid Society (HLAS) in New York where she served as pro bono counsel and held the following positions: deputy executive director (2022-2023); supervising attorney (2019-2022); and staff attorney (2017-2019). From 2013 to 2017, she was in private practice at U.S. Immigration Assist PA in Florida. From 2010 to 2013, she was an associate attorney at the Law Offices of Morano International PA in Florida. Judge Saldana Mistry is a member of the District of Columbia Bar, the Florida Bar, and the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Lucero Saldana Mistry.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 230 | 35 | 195 | 15.2% | 84.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 89 | 33 | 56 | 37.1% | 62.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 34 | 15 | 19 | 44.1% | 55.9% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 17 | 11 | 6 | 64.7% | 35.3% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 17 | 8 | 9 | 47.1% | 52.9% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 16 | 2 | 14 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46.2% | 53.8% | View details | |
Angola Moderate sample | 11 | 10 | 1 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Unknown Nationality Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belarus Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
India Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Kenya Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details |
Total decisions
230
Grants
35
Denials
195
Total decisions
89
Grants
33
Denials
56
Total decisions
34
Grants
15
Denials
19
Total decisions
17
Grants
11
Denials
6
Total decisions
17
Grants
8
Denials
9
Total decisions
16
Grants
2
Denials
14
Total decisions
13
Grants
6
Denials
7
Total decisions
11
Grants
10
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.